From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932534AbdJZPw6 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:52:58 -0400
Received: from mail-wm0-f42.google.com ([74.125.82.42]:53551 "EHLO
        mail-wm0-f42.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S932512AbdJZPwf (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 26 Oct 2017 11:52:35 -0400
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SekE10YQJu/DUEphZaYqycVmBSMXB+VX7Xpat0NpB9JFeHr7405rjBbVacv6cdtmOIRmZJYg==
From: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
        Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>,
        Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>
Cc: Clement Courbet <courbet@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2] lib: optimize cpumask_next_and()
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 2017 17:52:01 +0200
Message-Id: <20171026155201.26104-1-courbet@google.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.15.0.rc2.357.g7e34df9404-goog
In-Reply-To: <CACVxJT9+2wV34iYsQVCeqDi1HnUyJQTc-4Pf2ihW18R0rAmxSA@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CACVxJT9+2wV34iYsQVCeqDi1HnUyJQTc-4Pf2ihW18R0rAmxSA@mail.gmail.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Hi Alexey,

> Gentoo ships 5.4.0 which doesn't inline this code on x86_64 defconfig
> (which has OPTIMIZE_INLINING).

I have not actually marked _find_next_bit() inline, it just turns out
that my compiler inlines it.
I've tried out marking the function inline and OPTIMIZE_INLINING does
not un-inline it. I'll send a v4 with an explicit inine.