From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@android.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Dmitry Safonov <dsafonov@virtuozzo.com>,
John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
Andy Gross <andy.gross@linaro.org>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Andrew Pinski <apinski@cavium.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Mark Salyzyn <salyzyn@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/12] arm: vdso: enforce monotonic and realtime as inline
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 15:59:40 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171030155940.GR20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171027222531.57223-1-salyzyn@android.com>
On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 03:25:28PM -0700, Mark Salyzyn wrote:
> Ensure monotonic and realtime are inline, small price to pay for
> high volume common request.
Is this just based on a hunch, or is it based on proper measurement?
If proper measurement, where's the data? What CPU was it measured
with? How does this change affect other CPUs?
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-30 15:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-27 22:25 Mark Salyzyn
2017-10-30 14:10 ` Mark Rutland
2017-10-30 15:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2017-10-31 15:28 ` Mark Salyzyn
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171030155940.GR20805@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=andy.gross@linaro.org \
--cc=apinski@cavium.com \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dsafonov@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=labbott@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=salyzyn@android.com \
--cc=salyzyn@google.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®