From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S932838AbdJ3UTC (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:19:02 -0400
Received: from mga02.intel.com ([134.134.136.20]:12780 "EHLO mga02.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752062AbdJ3UTB (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:19:01 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.44,321,1505804400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="915554766"
Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 21:18:48 +0100
From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: intel-gfx <intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
        Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
        Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
        Ville =?utf-8?B?U3lyasOkbMOk?= <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [haswell_crtc_enable] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 109 at
 drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c:1066 drm_wait_one_vblank+0x18f/0x1a0 [drm]
Message-ID: <20171030201848.xhe7zkm4bn3w46mr@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
References: <CA+55aFxSJGeN=2X-uX-on1Uq2Nb8+v1aiMDz5H1+tKW_N5Q+6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <20171029225155.qcum5i75awrt5tzm@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
 <20171030070044.eibo4y43plbc2vbk@wfg-t540p.sh.intel.com>
 <CA+55aFztuX6PVxuzybv=tkp9kmvUp8QzB3zLU5w=Om49Rad1pg@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFztuX6PVxuzybv=tkp9kmvUp8QzB3zLU5w=Om49Rad1pg@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:10:11PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 12:00 AM, Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> wrote:
>> CC intel-gfx.
>
>Thanks, these are all interesting (even if some of them seem to be
>from random kernels).
>
>Fengguang, is this a new script that you started running? Because I'm
>*hoping* it's not that rc6 suddenly seems so flaky, and it's really
>that you now have a nice new script that started reporting these
>things better, even though many of them may be old?

Yes they are mostly not new issues to rc6. Just that I happen to start
this form of summary reporting now.

It's a bit late for rc6 and sorry about that! Next time when reporting
from rc1, we'll have much more time for working out proper fixes and
testing them out thoroughly.

Regards,
Fengguang