From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932900AbdJ3Uvi (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:51:38 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:45099 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751905AbdJ3Uvf (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Oct 2017 16:51:35 -0400 Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2017 13:51:34 -0700 From: Matthew Wilcox To: Jani Nikula Cc: Masahiro Yamada , Jonathan Corbet , "open list:DOCUMENTATION" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Michal Marek , Linux Kbuild mailing list , Matthew Wilcox Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check all .c files for bad kernel-doc comments Message-ID: <20171030205134.GA29718@bombadil.infradead.org> References: <20171027194149.14328-1-willy@infradead.org> <20171030134007.GA2846@bombadil.infradead.org> <87mv48fytl.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87mv48fytl.fsf@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.3 (2017-05-23) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 05:19:18PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > Related, there was also a script to do reStructuredText lint style > checks in addition to the kernel-doc checks using make CHECK and > C=1. See http://mid.mail-archive.com/87h98quc1w.fsf@intel.com I don't really care which patch goes in. If I understand your python script correctly, it relies on having various python packages installed. Unless we're going to switch kernel-doc over to being written in python, I'd prefer to not require additional dependencies.