From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756252AbdKCRc1 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 13:32:27 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:53236 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755819AbdKCRc0 (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Nov 2017 13:32:26 -0400 Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2017 10:32:24 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Tony Lindgren Cc: Joonsoo Kim , Michal Hocko , Stephen Rothwell , Linus Torvalds , Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Regression still in next for drop migrate type checks Message-Id: <20171103103224.524541d001571f63daa8fdcc@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20171103160012.GF28152@atomide.com> References: <20171103160012.GF28152@atomide.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.4.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 3 Nov 2017 09:00:12 -0700 Tony Lindgren wrote: > Looks like I'm still carrying patch "mm: distinguish CMA and MOVABLE > isolation in has_unmovable_pages" from Michal [1] for commit e1d753dff0fa > ("mm: drop migrate type checks from has_unmovable_pages") and Linux next > has been broken for CMA for few weeks now as noted in the discussion > also at [1]. > > What's the status of this regression? How come it's been known > broken for two weeks and still not fixed or reverted in next? > This is clearly is not suitable for "wider testing" ;) Travel to Europe and subsequent bustage in the -next tree held things up. Today's merge looks good so I expect to get this into Stephen today. In future, please feel free to send such hot fixes to Stephen.