From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752651AbdKECMo (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Nov 2017 22:12:44 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:56383 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752576AbdKECMn (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Nov 2017 22:12:43 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 Nov 2017 13:12:40 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Alexei Starovoitov Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , David Miller , Networking , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Yonghong Song , Daniel Borkmann Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the net-next tree Message-ID: <20171105131240.490847fa@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20171101162712.inf4ejbxmfm2kzie@ast-mbp> References: <20171101181554.1826e8c8@canb.auug.org.au> <20171101081832.zdehp7ysi5ecwsdv@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20171101082742.dteg337holmodzn2@gmail.com> <20171101085524.4dcxgaq7kawn37pq@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20171101162712.inf4ejbxmfm2kzie@ast-mbp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Alexei, On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 09:27:14 -0700 Alexei Starovoitov wrote: > > Also what do you mean by "same patch != same commit" ? > Like if we had pushed to some 3rd tree first and then pulled > into tip and net-next it would have been better? Well, it would not have caused a conflict. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell