From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751641AbdKFK1d (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2017 05:27:33 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f195.google.com ([209.85.192.195]:51593 "EHLO mail-pf0-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750760AbdKFK1c (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Nov 2017 05:27:32 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+SB946k+Hw2Yf/YFDZNtbF5aH0QX+GFvhvTF7zwXwPYvQdyaApgQO5re8YDVGrvYvc+ADHdnA== Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 19:27:26 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Laurent Dufour Cc: kemi , paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill@shutemov.name, ak@linux.intel.com, mhocko@kernel.org, dave@stgolabs.net, jack@suse.cz, Matthew Wilcox , benh@kernel.crashing.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, paulus@samba.org, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , hpa@zytor.com, Will Deacon , Sergey Senozhatsky , Andrea Arcangeli , Alexei Starovoitov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, haren@linux.vnet.ibm.com, khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, npiggin@gmail.com, bsingharora@gmail.com, Tim Chen , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [v5,22/22] powerpc/mm: Add speculative page fault Message-ID: <20171106102726.GB1298@jagdpanzerIV> References: <1507729966-10660-23-git-send-email-ldufour@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <7ca80231-fe02-a3a7-84bc-ce81690ea051@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (11/02/17 15:11), Laurent Dufour wrote: > On 26/10/2017 10:14, kemi wrote: > > Some regression is found by LKP-tools(linux kernel performance) on this patch series > > tested on Intel 2s/4s Skylake platform. > > The regression result is sorted by the metric will-it-scale.per_process_ops. > > Hi Kemi, > > Thanks for reporting this, I'll try to address it by turning some features > of the SPF path off when the process is monothreaded. make them madvice()-able? not all multi-threaded apps will necessarily benefit of SPF. right? just an idea. -ss