From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1759076AbdKHBCn (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 20:02:43 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41330 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759059AbdKHBCl (ORCPT ); Tue, 7 Nov 2017 20:02:41 -0500 Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2017 02:02:40 +0100 From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" To: Christophe JAILLET Cc: mcgrof@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] umh: Optimize 'proc_cap_handler()' Message-ID: <20171108010240.GL22894@wotan.suse.de> References: <20171020193331.7233-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171020193331.7233-1-christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.0 (2016-04-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 09:33:31PM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote: > If 'write' is 0, we can avoid a call to spin_lock/spin_unlock. > > Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET Sorry for the delay, I was travelling and will start nose diving now. I hope to have a concrete review and answer by tomorrow. Sorry for the two week delay on the review and thanks for the patch! Luis