From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753066AbdKIPxc (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2017 10:53:32 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f194.google.com ([209.85.192.194]:43572 "EHLO mail-pf0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751577AbdKIPx0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Nov 2017 10:53:26 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+Qq/dYaJ5jZHq8iOLYdCEUkx+gH5NxJ9Td884OCDXFcvHKUl9Tz2RW99bnZaNA32YCDodtNkQ== Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 07:53:23 -0800 From: Guenter Roeck To: David Miller Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] sparc: Provide cmpxchg64 for 32-bit builds Message-ID: <20171109155323.GA19959@roeck-us.net> References: <1509979305-11791-1-git-send-email-linux@roeck-us.net> <20171109.152852.88103578951782189.davem@davemloft.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171109.152852.88103578951782189.davem@davemloft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 03:28:52PM +0900, David Miller wrote: > From: Guenter Roeck > Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2017 06:41:45 -0800 > > > Fix the following build error, seen when building sparc32:allmodconfig. > > > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c: > > In function 'i40e_set_priv_flags': > > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c:4150:2: error: > > implicit declaration of function 'cmpxchg64' > > > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck > > Guenter, are you really not seeing this commit which has been > in my sparc GIT tree for a while? > Dave, At least as of yesterday, the patch had not found its way into mainline. I am running kernel build tests in my spare time, as community service. I do spend time before I submit a report or a proposed patch trying to find if the problem or its fix was already posted, just to avoid the "you dummy, this was already fixed" type feedback. However, I typically don't repeat that if it appears that the original report or submission was ignored. I just don't have the time to do that. So, no, I did not see the patch in your tree. Sorry for the noise. I'll refrain from reporting problems on sparc to avoid such noise in the future. I'll definitely no longer send out reminders. Guenter