From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754549AbdKJGPz (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Nov 2017 01:15:55 -0500 Received: from mail-wr0-f194.google.com ([209.85.128.194]:56896 "EHLO mail-wr0-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751215AbdKJGPx (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Nov 2017 01:15:53 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+QhW/0bAaHJyQDNTwfobD+oj54gH+oiLd/+q8iBHy0fwa19BJArvvylQcRfqcd+P07I7E7UTg== Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2017 07:15:50 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar To: Ilya Dryomov Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Jason Wessel , Alexander Shishkin , Daniel Thompson , kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: KGDB/KDB treats WARN*() as Oops on x86 since 4.12 Message-ID: <20171110061550.rgxdy7tmh4ksf4mt@gmail.com> References: <7d12c8e1-0389-9982-9fd8-070dc0d26bef@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Ilya Dryomov wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 4:59 PM, Daniel Thompson > wrote: > > On 09/10/17 13:24, Ilya Dryomov wrote: > >> > >> Hi Jason, > >> > >> Starting with 4.12, WARN*() is implemented with ud0, generating an > >> Invalid Opcode exception. KGDB/KDB gets entered as if it were an Oops, > >> making KGDB/KDB rather hard to use, particularly on testing kernels. > >> > >> Alexander posted a fix a while back, but Peter seems to be waiting for > >> your ack. Could you please weigh in? > >> > >> [PATCH] x86/debug: Handle warnings before the notifier chain > >> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9859065/ > > > > > > Hmnnn... IIRC arm64 code has been also been blocked for a couple of releases > > whilst Will D. waited for an ack that never came. > > > > My own reading of the code is that the patch in question restores the status > > quo, that there will still be mechanisms to provoke entry to kdb/kgdb during > > a warning (breakpoint on __warn, engage panic_on_warn, etc) and that these > > are not obviously recursive[1]. > > > > Put another way I'm happy to dig the patch out of my mail archive and throw > > in an Acked-By: but since I have no official role within kdb/kgdb (I'm just > > an interested bystander) it might not be enough for Peter. > > > > > > Daniel. > > > > > > [1] I'm not a huge x86 expert so correct me if I am wrong but I think > > its ok for us to trap here providing its for a different reason. > > Hi Peter, Ingo, > > Could you please consider taking Alexander's patch for 4.15? Jason > never replied to any of our pings and hasn't been actively involved > with kgdb recently. In the meantime, this regression makes running > e.g. xfstests runs with kgdb enabled pretty much impossible. Ok, agreed, I picked the fix up into tip:x86/urgent, with a -stable backporting tag, and will try to get it to Linus for v4.15 (it will also get backported to v4.14 which is affected as well). Thanks, Ingo