From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1753832AbdKKMLA (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Sat, 11 Nov 2017 07:11:00 -0500
Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:22381 "EHLO
        aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1753050AbdKKMK7 (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Sat, 11 Nov 2017 07:10:59 -0500
Date: Sat, 11 Nov 2017 15:10:45 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: Marcus Wolf <marcus.wolf@smarthome-wolf.de>
Cc: devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: staging: pi433: Possible bug in rf69.c
Message-ID: <20171111121045.nzwlgjraethbptir@mwanda>
References: <709d3e3f-be3b-aa98-1cf6-6a048ef14d7b@smarthome-wolf.de>
 <20171110193258.qv6dbokqpjrrq3yb@mwanda>
 <a8d75f3c-b7b1-19eb-4ecb-54b9a003d34c@smarthome-wolf.de>
 <20171111084501.chwx5ku2senlgdza@mwanda>
 <2e82e800-618a-b332-41c8-ee8aa97da88b@smarthome-wolf.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <2e82e800-618a-b332-41c8-ee8aa97da88b@smarthome-wolf.de>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
X-Source-IP: userv0022.oracle.com [156.151.31.74]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Nov 11, 2017 at 11:42:09AM +0200, Marcus Wolf wrote:
> But I still need to know when to use staging and when to use linux-next.
> I don't want to prepare patches for the wrong tree.

Ah, I see now that the confusion is Al's patch.  Al is a law unto
himself so I don't know the answer.  Normally the advice would be to
work off staging-next.

regards,
dan carpenter