From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753597AbdKNHfw (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:35:52 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:51909 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752907AbdKNHfp (ORCPT ); Tue, 14 Nov 2017 02:35:45 -0500 Date: Tue, 14 Nov 2017 08:35:39 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Wanpeng Li Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , kvm , Paolo Bonzini , Radim Kr??m???? , Wanpeng Li Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] KVM: X86: Add paravirt remote TLB flush Message-ID: <20171114073539.jtorcwygspaqbpjb@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1510533206-9821-1-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> <1510533206-9821-3-git-send-email-wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> <20171113080403.ici7nt5r4b5fpxa6@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20171113104634.62cmjalnj73scfnl@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20171113130226.ijxoxwozeoxqdsxw@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 02:10:16PM +0800, Wanpeng Li wrote: > 2017-11-13 21:02 GMT+08:00 Peter Zijlstra : > > That can be written like: > > > > do { > > if (state & KVM_VCPU_PREEMPTED) > > new_state = state | KVM_VCPU_SHOULD_FLUSH; > > else > > new_state = state | KVM_VCPU_IPI_PENDING; > > } while (!try_cmpxchg(&src->preempted, state, new_state); > > > > if (new_state & KVM_VCPU_IPI_PENDING) > > Should be new_state & KVM_VCPU_SHOULD_FLUSH I think. Quite so indeed.