From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: New sparse warnings from sched.h
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2017 06:54:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171115145445.GA319@bombadil.infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171115082743.6nvdz3yk6ln2ftc5@gmail.com>
On Wed, Nov 15, 2017 at 09:27:43AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:
> > commit 799ba82de01e7543f6b2042e1a739f3a20255f23
> > Author: luca abeni <luca.abeni@santannapisa.it>
> > Date: Thu Sep 7 12:09:31 2017 +0200
> >
> > sched/deadline: Use C bitfields for the state flags
> >
> > Ask the compiler to use a single bit for storing true / false values,
> > instead of wasting the size of a whole int value.
> > Tested with gcc 5.4.0 on x86_64, and the compiler produces the expected
> > Assembly (similar to the Assembly code generated when explicitly accessing
> > the bits with bitmasks, "&" and "|").
> >
> > produces four warnings from sparse for every file which includes sched.h:
> >
> > ./include/linux/sched.h:476:62: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
> > ./include/linux/sched.h:477:62: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
> > ./include/linux/sched.h:478:62: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
> > ./include/linux/sched.h:479:62: error: dubious one-bit signed bitfield
> >
> > This seems like the trivial fix (untested):
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> > index a5dc7c98b0a2..21991d668d35 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> > @@ -473,10 +473,10 @@ struct sched_dl_entity {
> > * conditions between the inactive timer handler and the wakeup
> > * code.
> > */
> > - int dl_throttled : 1;
> > - int dl_boosted : 1;
> > - int dl_yielded : 1;
> > - int dl_non_contending : 1;
> > + unsigned int dl_throttled : 1;
> > + unsigned int dl_boosted : 1;
> > + unsigned int dl_yielded : 1;
> > + unsigned int dl_non_contending : 1;
> >
> > /*
> > * Bandwidth enforcement timer. Each -deadline task has its
>
> Mind sending a proper patch with a SOB once it's tested?
I'd be more than happy to do that. I have no idea what this code is,
what it's used for, or how to test it, so I'll have to rely on somebody
else to test it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-15 14:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-14 20:41 Matthew Wilcox
2017-11-15 8:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-15 14:54 ` Matthew Wilcox [this message]
2017-11-15 15:10 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-11-15 8:36 ` luca abeni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171115145445.GA319@bombadil.infradead.org \
--to=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=bristot@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luca.abeni@santannapisa.it \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®