From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752881AbdKTVEH (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 20 Nov 2017 16:04:07 -0500
Received: from mail-io0-f193.google.com ([209.85.223.193]:38670 "EHLO
        mail-io0-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751123AbdKTVEF (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 20 Nov 2017 16:04:05 -0500
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbK71VP226pSPnvPJW69FMO1FsfCL4eM0Go8CB/5eAozAHmzYUBHBZJp5SfteIf9DIJTVDQiQ==
Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 13:04:00 -0800
From: Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>
To: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Alex Matveev <alxmtvv@gmail.com>, Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
        Greg Hackmann <ghackmann@google.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
        Maxim Kuvyrkov <maxim.kuvyrkov@linaro.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
        Yury Norov <ynorov@caviumnetworks.com>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/18] Add support for clang LTO
Message-ID: <20171120210400.GE89108@samitolvanen.mtv.corp.google.com>
References: <20171115213428.22559-1-samitolvanen@google.com>
 <20171120152139.mfqthlbneeeiythr@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171120152139.mfqthlbneeeiythr@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 03:21:40PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Would it be possible to split this into:
> 
> (1) (basic) arm64 clang support
> (2) gold support (no LTO)
> (3) LTO support
> 
> ... with any necessary workarounds added as-required to the relevant
> series?

Absolutely. I'll split the patches into more sensible sets.

Sami