From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Andrew Hunter <ahh@google.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
Chris Lameter <cl@linux.com>, Ben Maurer <bmaurer@fb.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Maged Michael <maged.michael@gmail.com>,
Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
x86@kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH for 4.15 v2 21/22] membarrier: provide SHARED_EXPEDITED command
Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2017 09:18:59 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171121141900.18471-22-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171121141900.18471-1-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Allow expedited membarrier to be used for data shared between processes
(shared memory).
Processes wishing to receive the membarriers register with
MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED. Those which want to issue
membarrier invoke MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED.
This allows extremely simple kernel-level implementation: we have almost
everything we need with the PRIVATE_EXPEDITED barrier code. All we need
to do is to add a flag in the mm_struct that will be used to check
whether we need to send the IPI to the current thread of each CPU.
There is a slight downside of this approach compared to targeting
specific shared memory users: when performing a membarrier operation,
all registered "shared" receivers will get the barrier, even if they
don't share a memory mapping with the "sender" issuing
MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED.
This registration approach seems to fit the requirement of not
disturbing processes that really deeply care about real-time: they
simply should not register with MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
CC: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
CC: Andrew Hunter <ahh@google.com>
CC: Maged Michael <maged.michael@gmail.com>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@scylladb.com>
CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
CC: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
CC: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
CC: Dave Watson <davejwatson@fb.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
CC: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
CC: x86@kernel.org
---
Changes since v1:
- Add missing preempt disable around smp_call_function_many().
---
arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h | 3 +-
include/linux/sched/mm.h | 6 +-
include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h | 34 ++++++++--
kernel/sched/membarrier.c | 114 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
4 files changed, 143 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h
index 046f96768ab5..ddf4baedd132 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/membarrier.h
@@ -12,7 +12,8 @@ static inline void membarrier_arch_switch_mm(struct mm_struct *prev,
* store to rq->curr.
*/
if (likely(!(atomic_read(&next->membarrier_state)
- & MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED) || !prev))
+ & (MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED
+ | MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED)) || !prev))
return;
/*
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/mm.h b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
index 0f9e1a96b890..c7b0f5970d7c 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/mm.h
@@ -219,8 +219,10 @@ static inline void memalloc_noreclaim_restore(unsigned int flags)
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMBARRIER
enum {
- MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_READY = (1U << 0),
- MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED = (1U << 1),
+ MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_READY = (1U << 0),
+ MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED = (1U << 1),
+ MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED_READY = (1U << 2),
+ MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED = (1U << 3),
};
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_MEMBARRIER_HOOKS
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h b/include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h
index 4e01ad7ffe98..2de01e595d3b 100644
--- a/include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h
+++ b/include/uapi/linux/membarrier.h
@@ -40,6 +40,28 @@
* (non-running threads are de facto in such a
* state). This covers threads from all processes
* running on the system. This command returns 0.
+ * @MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED:
+ * Execute a memory barrier on all running threads
+ * part of a process which previously registered
+ * with MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED.
+ * Upon return from system call, the caller thread
+ * is ensured that all running threads have passed
+ * through a state where all memory accesses to
+ * user-space addresses match program order between
+ * entry to and return from the system call
+ * (non-running threads are de facto in such a
+ * state). This only covers threads from processes
+ * which registered with
+ * MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED.
+ * This command returns 0. Given that
+ * registration is about the intent to receive
+ * the barriers, it is valid to invoke
+ * MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED from a
+ * non-registered process.
+ * @MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED:
+ * Register the process intent to receive
+ * MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED memory
+ * barriers. Always returns 0.
* @MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED:
* Execute a memory barrier on each running
* thread belonging to the same process as the current
@@ -70,12 +92,12 @@
* the value 0.
*/
enum membarrier_cmd {
- MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY = 0,
- MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED = (1 << 0),
- /* reserved for MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED (1 << 1) */
- /* reserved for MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE (1 << 2) */
- MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED = (1 << 3),
- MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED = (1 << 4),
+ MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY = 0,
+ MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED = (1 << 0),
+ MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED = (1 << 1),
+ MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED = (1 << 2),
+ MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED = (1 << 3),
+ MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED = (1 << 4),
};
#endif /* _UAPI_LINUX_MEMBARRIER_H */
diff --git a/kernel/sched/membarrier.c b/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
index 7d2ec7202ba8..b1312eb9d292 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/membarrier.c
@@ -27,7 +27,9 @@
* except MEMBARRIER_CMD_QUERY.
*/
#define MEMBARRIER_CMD_BITMASK \
- (MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED | MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED \
+ (MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED | MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED \
+ | MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED \
+ | MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED \
| MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED)
static void ipi_mb(void *info)
@@ -35,6 +37,73 @@ static void ipi_mb(void *info)
smp_mb(); /* IPIs should be serializing but paranoid. */
}
+static int membarrier_shared_expedited(void)
+{
+ int cpu;
+ bool fallback = false;
+ cpumask_var_t tmpmask;
+
+ if (num_online_cpus() == 1)
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Matches memory barriers around rq->curr modification in
+ * scheduler.
+ */
+ smp_mb(); /* system call entry is not a mb. */
+
+ /*
+ * Expedited membarrier commands guarantee that they won't
+ * block, hence the GFP_NOWAIT allocation flag and fallback
+ * implementation.
+ */
+ if (!zalloc_cpumask_var(&tmpmask, GFP_NOWAIT)) {
+ /* Fallback for OOM. */
+ fallback = true;
+ }
+
+ cpus_read_lock();
+ for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
+ struct task_struct *p;
+
+ /*
+ * Skipping the current CPU is OK even through we can be
+ * migrated at any point. The current CPU, at the point
+ * where we read raw_smp_processor_id(), is ensured to
+ * be in program order with respect to the caller
+ * thread. Therefore, we can skip this CPU from the
+ * iteration.
+ */
+ if (cpu == raw_smp_processor_id())
+ continue;
+ rcu_read_lock();
+ p = task_rcu_dereference(&cpu_rq(cpu)->curr);
+ if (p && p->mm && (atomic_read(&p->mm->membarrier_state)
+ & MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED)) {
+ if (!fallback)
+ __cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, tmpmask);
+ else
+ smp_call_function_single(cpu, ipi_mb, NULL, 1);
+ }
+ rcu_read_unlock();
+ }
+ if (!fallback) {
+ preempt_disable();
+ smp_call_function_many(tmpmask, ipi_mb, NULL, 1);
+ preempt_enable();
+ free_cpumask_var(tmpmask);
+ }
+ cpus_read_unlock();
+
+ /*
+ * Memory barrier on the caller thread _after_ we finished
+ * waiting for the last IPI. Matches memory barriers around
+ * rq->curr modification in scheduler.
+ */
+ smp_mb(); /* exit from system call is not a mb */
+ return 0;
+}
+
static int membarrier_private_expedited(void)
{
int cpu;
@@ -105,7 +174,38 @@ static int membarrier_private_expedited(void)
return 0;
}
-static void membarrier_register_private_expedited(void)
+static int membarrier_register_shared_expedited(void)
+{
+ struct task_struct *p = current;
+ struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
+
+ if (atomic_read(&mm->membarrier_state)
+ & MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED_READY)
+ return 0;
+ atomic_or(MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED, &mm->membarrier_state);
+ if (atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 1 && get_nr_threads(p) == 1) {
+ /*
+ * For single mm user, single threaded process, we can
+ * simply issue a memory barrier after setting
+ * MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED to guarantee that
+ * no memory access following registration is reordered
+ * before registration.
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * For multi-mm user threads, we need to ensure all
+ * future scheduler executions will observe the new
+ * thread flag state for this mm.
+ */
+ synchronize_sched();
+ }
+ atomic_or(MEMBARRIER_STATE_SHARED_EXPEDITED_READY,
+ &mm->membarrier_state);
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int membarrier_register_private_expedited(void)
{
struct task_struct *p = current;
struct mm_struct *mm = p->mm;
@@ -117,7 +217,7 @@ static void membarrier_register_private_expedited(void)
*/
if (atomic_read(&mm->membarrier_state)
& MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_READY)
- return;
+ return 0;
atomic_or(MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED,
&mm->membarrier_state);
if (!(atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) == 1 && get_nr_threads(p) == 1)) {
@@ -129,6 +229,7 @@ static void membarrier_register_private_expedited(void)
}
atomic_or(MEMBARRIER_STATE_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED_READY,
&mm->membarrier_state);
+ return 0;
}
/**
@@ -178,11 +279,14 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(membarrier, int, cmd, int, flags)
if (num_online_cpus() > 1)
synchronize_sched();
return 0;
+ case MEMBARRIER_CMD_SHARED_EXPEDITED:
+ return membarrier_shared_expedited();
+ case MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_SHARED_EXPEDITED:
+ return membarrier_register_shared_expedited();
case MEMBARRIER_CMD_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED:
return membarrier_private_expedited();
case MEMBARRIER_CMD_REGISTER_PRIVATE_EXPEDITED:
- membarrier_register_private_expedited();
- return 0;
+ return membarrier_register_private_expedited();
default:
return -EINVAL;
}
--
2.11.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-11-21 14:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-21 14:18 [RFC PATCH for 4.15 v12 00/22] Restartable sequences and CPU op vector Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 01/22] uapi headers: Provide types_32_64.h Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 v12 02/22] rseq: Introduce restartable sequences system call Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 03/22] arm: Add restartable sequences support Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 04/22] arm: Wire up restartable sequences system call Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 05/22] x86: Add support for restartable sequences Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 06/22] x86: Wire up restartable sequence system call Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 07/22] powerpc: Add support for restartable sequences Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 08/22] powerpc: Wire up restartable sequences system call Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 09/22] sched: Implement push_task_to_cpu Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 v4 10/22] cpu_opv: Provide cpu_opv system call Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 11/22] x86: Wire up " Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 12/22] powerpc: " Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 13/22] arm: " Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 v3 14/22] cpu_opv: selftests: Implement selftests Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 15:17 ` Shuah Khan
2017-11-21 16:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 v3 15/22] rseq: selftests: Provide self-tests Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 15:34 ` Shuah Khan
2017-11-21 17:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 17:40 ` Shuah Khan
2017-11-21 21:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 21:24 ` Shuah Khan
2017-11-21 21:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-22 19:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-23 21:16 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-22 21:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-23 22:53 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-23 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-23 8:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-24 14:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-24 13:55 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 16/22] rseq: selftests: arm: workaround gcc asm size guess Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 15:39 ` Shuah Khan
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 17/22] Fix: membarrier: add missing preempt off around smp_call_function_many Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 18/22] membarrier: selftest: Test private expedited cmd Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 v7 19/22] powerpc: membarrier: Skip memory barrier in switch_mm() Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 v5 20/22] membarrier: Document scheduler barrier requirements Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 14:18 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2017-11-21 14:19 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 22/22] membarrier: selftest: Test shared expedited cmd Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 17:21 ` [RFC PATCH for 4.15 v12 00/22] Restartable sequences and CPU op vector Andi Kleen
2017-11-21 22:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 22:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-22 12:36 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-22 15:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-22 15:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-11-22 16:43 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-22 18:10 ` Andi Kleen
2017-11-22 19:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-22 19:37 ` Will Deacon
2017-11-23 21:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-23 22:51 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-23 23:01 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-23 23:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-24 0:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-24 14:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-23 21:13 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-23 21:49 ` Andi Kleen
2017-11-21 22:19 ` [PATCH update for 4.15 1/3] selftests: lib.mk: Introduce OVERRIDE_TARGETS Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-21 22:22 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-22 15:16 ` Shuah Khan
2017-11-21 22:19 ` [PATCH update for 4.15 2/3] cpu_opv: selftests: Implement selftests (v4) Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-22 15:20 ` Shuah Khan
2017-11-21 22:19 ` [PATCH update for 4.15 3/3] rseq: selftests: Provide self-tests (v4) Mathieu Desnoyers
2017-11-22 15:23 ` Shuah Khan
2017-11-22 16:31 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171121141900.18471-22-mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=ahh@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avi@scylladb.com \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=bmaurer@fb.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@linux.com \
--cc=davejwatson@fb.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=maged.michael@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®