From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752057AbdKVLKT (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2017 06:10:19 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.83.49]:45703 "EHLO mail-pg0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751356AbdKVLKR (ORCPT ); Wed, 22 Nov 2017 06:10:17 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMYrlh5jJqM5+x+UQD05HIE9bapz1NriXfn+T0ctIxIy1ef8ZvoaSV9oE65vZr3SFf+8Sc+wAQ== Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 16:40:13 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Sudeep Holla Cc: Eduardo Valentin , Javi Merino , Vincent Guittot , Lukasz Luba , Daniel Lezcano , Ionela Voinescu , Punit Agrawal , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Amit Daniel Kachhap , Zhang Rui , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Linux PM , Lukasz Luba , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] cpu_cooling: Drop static-power related stuff Message-ID: <20171122111013.GB4084@vireshk-i7> References: <20171116234422.GA6141@localhost.localdomain> <878tf5tbfj.fsf@e105922-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <35d3751d-f28d-38c2-02b2-c9980f11c52e@arm.com> <5A144CB3.50806@gmail.com> <20171121165703.GA2499@localhost.localdomain> <20171121180006.GA26638@localhost> <20171121181222.GA4075@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 22-11-17, 10:59, Sudeep Holla wrote: > IMO, if the $subject code is expected to be used on Juno, then my answer > is no if one can't test it reliably and also prove that static power > really matters on Juno. So far, I have heard both the above is not > possible. So please delete the code if Juno is the only user in > short and mid term. We can get the code back if we find any users in > longer term. Its funny that the $subject patch receives few Acks and Nacks every day now :) -- viresh