From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752734AbdKWLwE (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Thu, 23 Nov 2017 06:52:04 -0500
Received: from userp1040.oracle.com ([156.151.31.81]:18499 "EHLO
        userp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1751965AbdKWLwC (ORCPT
        <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Thu, 23 Nov 2017 06:52:02 -0500
Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2017 14:51:38 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
To: "Tobin C. Harding" <me@tobin.cc>
Cc: Stefano Manni <stefano.manni@gmail.com>, devel@driverdev.osuosl.org,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>,
        Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com>,
        lustre-devel@lists.lustre.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] staging: lustre: fixed some signedness warns from
 sparse
Message-ID: <20171123115138.5nku6epnct35mmha@mwanda>
References: <20171122193831.11801-1-stefano.manni@gmail.com>
 <20171123045926.GD12736@eros>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20171123045926.GD12736@eros>
User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)
X-Source-IP: userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 03:59:26PM +1100, Tobin C. Harding wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 22, 2017 at 08:38:27PM +0100, Stefano Manni wrote:
> > Fixed some signedness warnings from sparse on lustre.
> > 
> > Stefano Manni (4):
> >   staging: lustre: fixed signedness of some socklnd params
> >   staging: lustre: fixed signedness of llite
> >   staging: lustre: fixed signedness of lov
> >   staging: lustre: fixed signedness of obdclass
> 
> You may like to use imperative mood for your git log brief descriptions
> Stefano.  
> 
> s/fixed/fix/
> 

Someone once chewed me a second butt hole for not using the imperative
mood so I know some people care intensely about this but I think so long
as you can understand the description it's fine.  I will never send a
patch for that maintainer's subsystem again, btw, which is probably
grateful for and now I can poop twice as fast so we're both winners.

Especially in the 0/4 patch which is going to be discarded.  Who cares?

regards,
dan carpenter