From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753594AbdKXNnu (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2017 08:43:50 -0500 Received: from merlin.infradead.org ([205.233.59.134]:60980 "EHLO merlin.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753351AbdKXNnt (ORCPT ); Fri, 24 Nov 2017 08:43:49 -0500 Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2017 14:43:40 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen , Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , "H . Peter Anvin" , Borislav Petkov , Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH 28/43] x86/mm/kaiser: Map CPU entry area Message-ID: <20171124134340.u4ulw6tjigdmemmi@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20171124091448.7649-1-mingo@kernel.org> <20171124091448.7649-29-mingo@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171124091448.7649-29-mingo@kernel.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 10:14:33AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > + /* CPU 0's mapping is done in kaiser_init() */ > + if (cpu) > + kaiser_add_mapping_cpu_entry(cpu); This hard assumes CPU0 is the boot CPU. I know we dropped Voyager support a while back, but can/should we hard rely on that? We do have __boot_cpu_id / get_boot_cpu_id() for these here things.