From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752035AbdK0Kim (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Mon, 27 Nov 2017 05:38:42 -0500
Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.101.70]:35810 "EHLO foss.arm.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1751773AbdK0Kik (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Mon, 27 Nov 2017 05:38:40 -0500
From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com
Cc: acme@redhat.com, apw@canonical.com, joe@perches.com,
        mark.rutland@arm.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, peterz@infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] checkpatch: remove ACCESS_ONCE() warning
Date: Mon, 27 Nov 2017 10:38:24 +0000
Message-Id: <20171127103824.36526-5-mark.rutland@arm.com>
X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.11.0
In-Reply-To: <20171127103824.36526-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
References: <20171127103824.36526-1-mark.rutland@arm.com>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Now that ACCESS_ONCE() has been excised from the kernel, any uses will
result in a build error, and we no longer need to whine about it in
checkpatch.

This patch removes the newly redundant warning.

Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 scripts/checkpatch.pl | 22 ----------------------
 1 file changed, 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
index 95cda3ecc66b..95c08493b78b 100755
--- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
+++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
@@ -6233,28 +6233,6 @@ sub process {
 			}
 		}
 
-# whine about ACCESS_ONCE
-		if ($^V && $^V ge 5.10.0 &&
-		    $line =~ /\bACCESS_ONCE\s*$balanced_parens\s*(=(?!=))?\s*($FuncArg)?/) {
-			my $par = $1;
-			my $eq = $2;
-			my $fun = $3;
-			$par =~ s/^\(\s*(.*)\s*\)$/$1/;
-			if (defined($eq)) {
-				if (WARN("PREFER_WRITE_ONCE",
-					 "Prefer WRITE_ONCE(<FOO>, <BAR>) over ACCESS_ONCE(<FOO>) = <BAR>\n" . $herecurr) &&
-				    $fix) {
-					$fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\bACCESS_ONCE\s*\(\s*\Q$par\E\s*\)\s*$eq\s*\Q$fun\E/WRITE_ONCE($par, $fun)/;
-				}
-			} else {
-				if (WARN("PREFER_READ_ONCE",
-					 "Prefer READ_ONCE(<FOO>) over ACCESS_ONCE(<FOO>)\n" . $herecurr) &&
-				    $fix) {
-					$fixed[$fixlinenr] =~ s/\bACCESS_ONCE\s*\(\s*\Q$par\E\s*\)/READ_ONCE($par)/;
-				}
-			}
-		}
-
 # check for mutex_trylock_recursive usage
 		if ($line =~ /mutex_trylock_recursive/) {
 			ERROR("LOCKING",
-- 
2.11.0