From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752416AbdK2HZH (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 02:25:07 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f65.google.com ([74.125.83.65]:43444 "EHLO mail-pg0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752183AbdK2HZD (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 02:25:03 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMbJCMBQgFm6XigwoWCBL9iOZutzDCzagT1GyKrRcc5t6xYYkdHsASeLms4m9szn6KqPhX1s/w== Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 16:24:58 +0900 From: Sergey Senozhatsky To: Petr Mladek Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky , Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , Helge Deller , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Paul Mackerras , Michael Ellerman , James Bottomley , Andrew Morton , Jessica Yu , Steven Rostedt , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 0/6] printk/ia64/ppc64/parisc64: let's deprecate %pF/%pf printk specifiers Message-ID: <20171129072458.GA468@jagdpanzerIV> References: <20171109234830.5067-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20171128154710.ytqixlioc3hrcbl3@pathway.suse.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171128154710.ytqixlioc3hrcbl3@pathway.suse.cz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On (11/28/17 16:47), Petr Mladek wrote: > On Fri 2017-11-10 08:48:24, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > > Hello, > > > > A reworked version. There is a new dereference_symbol_descriptor() > > function now, where "the magic happens", so I don't touch kallsyms_lookup() > > and module_address_lookup() anymore. > > The new version looks good to me. Thanks a lot for reworking it. > I feel much better now. For the whole series: > > Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek > > > All Ack-s/Tested-by-s were dropped, since the patch set has been > > reworked. I'm kindly asking arch-s maintainers and developers to test it > > once again. Sorry for any inconveniences and thanks for your help in > > advance. > > I see that it was tested on all affected architectures. Thanks a lot > all testers. > > It seems that we are ready to go. I am going to push this into > for-4.16 branch in printk.git. thanks. -ss