From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754361AbdK2KoU (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:44:20 -0500 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:47052 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752430AbdK2KoR (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Nov 2017 05:44:17 -0500 Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2017 10:44:11 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Naresh Kamboju , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Ben Hutchings , Shuah Khan , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, patches@kernelci.org, linux- stable , akpm@linux-foundation.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, Guenter Roeck , Tom Gall Subject: Re: [Lkft-triage] [PATCH 4.9 000/138] 4.9.66-stable review Message-ID: <20171129104411.vw6vsow2iphmisgw@sirena.org.uk> References: <20171128100544.706504901@linuxfoundation.org> <20171129080745.GG1918@kroah.com> <20171129100702.gjegesf4dt7mv67y@sirena.org.uk> <20171129103515.GA14188@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zz72dtbttd7gyijm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20171129103515.GA14188@kroah.com> X-Cookie: Pushing 40 is exercise enough. User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --zz72dtbttd7gyijm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:35:15AM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:07:02AM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > There's another internal list for looking at LKFT been set up and > > they've set it up as a mailman list adding subject prefixes :( > That's a pretty horrid thing to spam the public with :( > I'm going to drop the linaro.org address from my -rc announcements now > until someone learns how to properly sort their mailing lists by mail > headers, and not email subjects... I'm pretty sure it's just an oversight due to it being the default in mailman rather than something deliberately chosen but yeah. --zz72dtbttd7gyijm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAloej3sACgkQJNaLcl1U h9AAWwgAhd4Bjg8FRFZni58Hl10lzamsMrp1LKBH/Hg+GsO4YCMQ22CV6bY7idF0 FQhSwrE44rhgIMR95Fnz0fjI6Y9WRprMTN/0mdD2Vd2ABHsqKA4L0/ZWJbvODkIc OrEHvc0Fxe+c/R3ZpqXfULg+leasThWLq26AQIrqhSkkwVJmelAJFoV4BoTBApIC ooVdMTyFeZ2nySO9b+UunqfzFhgAsZwqvpB+NwNvAITEuumPf9I50DSSJW3Q5qKS d+xuSuzBe4exU0QOkwucVh2HNKgMtmDA55/iacmew0vgUzAsV3QHzrJ4JMvkiBS9 wn2eEm5sURKmcgOre3jNqcNoENKL+A== =E8F8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zz72dtbttd7gyijm--