From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752767AbdK3NMN (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:12:13 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:50200 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752359AbdK3NML (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Nov 2017 08:12:11 -0500 Date: Thu, 30 Nov 2017 14:12:04 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Radim =?utf-8?B?S3LEjW3DocWZ?= Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini , Alexander Graf , "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Jan =?utf-8?Q?H=2E_Sch=C3=B6nherr?= , KarimAllah Ahmed , Jim Mattson Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] KVM: x86: kvm_mwait_in_guest() cleanup Message-ID: <20171130131203.qyfmwipazzk4yzvx@pd.tnic> References: <20171129212343.23167-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20171129212343.23167-1-rkrcmar@redhat.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 10:23:40PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote: > This is a rebased version of an old series that simplified > kvm_mwait_in_guest: https://www.spinics.net/lists/kvm/msg149238.html > > AMD errata 400 patch was dropped thanks to Boris's review; > [2/3] got an expanded commit message and I didn't include Alexander's > r-b since the context changed when we didn't drop support for ancient > CPUs. > > Radim Krčmář (3): > KVM: x86: prevent MWAIT in guest with buggy MONITOR > KVM: x86: drop bogus MWAIT check > KVM: x86: simplify kvm_mwait_in_guest() > > arch/x86/kvm/x86.h | 32 ++------------------------------ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-) Looks ok to me, AFAICT. So FWIW: Acked-by: Borislav Petkov -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.