From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752228AbdLEDUg (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 22:20:36 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:54459 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750995AbdLEDUe (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Dec 2017 22:20:34 -0500 Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 14:20:31 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Chris Metcalf Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: remove the tile tree? Message-ID: <20171205142031.6941097b@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20171205072541.6c30d7b9@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by nfs id vB53Kfc2003506 Hi Chris, On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 20:33:59 -0500 Chris Metcalf wrote: > > On 12/4/2017 3:25 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi Chris, > > > > Given commit > > > > 8ee5ad1d4c0b ("arch/tile: mark as orphaned") > > > > in Linus' tree, should I remove the tile tree from linux-next? > > Yes, that would make sense.  Good catch! Done, thanks -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell