From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
lkp@01.org, Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, kernel-team@lge.com
Subject: Re: BUG: KASAN: slab-out-of-bounds in perf_callchain_user+0x494/0x530
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 23:47:18 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171205144718.GA27916@danjae.aot.lge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171205133740.GA28405@kernel.org>
Hi Arnaldo,
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 10:37:40AM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 05:11:56PM +0900, Namhyung Kim escreveu:
> > Also I'm not sure that the allocation failure check would work
> > correctly since it decrements nr_callchain_events when it fails.
>
> Can you elaborate a bit more?
Sure, I mean the following code:
mutex_lock(&callchain_mutex);
count = atomic_inc_return(&nr_callchain_events);
if (WARN_ON_ONCE(count < 1)) {
err = -EINVAL;
goto exit;
}
if (count > 1) {
/* If the allocation failed, give up */
if (!callchain_cpus_entries)
err = -ENOMEM;
goto exit;
}
err = alloc_callchain_buffers();
exit:
if (err)
atomic_dec(&nr_callchain_events);
mutex_unlock(&callchain_mutex);
The callchain_cpus_entries is allocated in alloc_callchain_buffers()
only when the count is 1. But if it failed to allocate, it decrease
the count so next event would try to allocate it again. Thus it seems
not possible to see the callchain_cpus_entries being NULL in the
'if (count > 1)' block. If you want to make next event give up, it'd
need to take an additional count IMHO.
Thanks,
Namhyung
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-05 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-11-30 2:32 Fengguang Wu
2017-11-30 8:20 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-11-30 19:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-12-05 8:11 ` Namhyung Kim
2017-12-05 13:37 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-12-05 14:47 ` Namhyung Kim [this message]
2017-12-06 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-06 14:12 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2017-12-06 14:31 ` Namhyung Kim
2017-12-06 15:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-06 15:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2017-12-06 16:39 ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-06 15:46 ` Namhyung Kim
2017-12-06 13:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171205144718.GA27916@danjae.aot.lge.com \
--to=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=fengguang.wu@intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kernel-team@lge.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@01.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=wangnan0@huawei.com \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome