From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@i2se.com>,
Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>, Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Matthias Reichl <hias@horus.com>,
linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Arm: mm: ftrace: Only set text back to ro after kernel has been marked ro
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2017 20:09:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171205200935.GY10595@n2100.armlinux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jJb0PCSuC4DuOkh5-901iVLcmmPpn1G7UBq3-r9DaeMvw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Dec 05, 2017 at 11:35:59AM -0800, Kees Cook wrote:
> We don't _need_ to, but they're all contiguous, so the ro_perms array
> used by set_kernel_text_*() is actually only a single entry:
>
> static struct section_perm ro_perms[] = {
> /* Make kernel code and rodata RX (set RO). */
> {
> .name = "text/rodata RO",
> .start = (unsigned long)_stext,
> .end = (unsigned long)__init_begin,
> ...
Well, they may not be contiguous - it depends on DEBUG_ALIGN_RODATA.
Either way, we have __start_rodata_section_aligned, which is either
the start of the read-only data section, or the start of the first
section beyond __start_rodata if DEBUG_ALIGN_RODATA is not set.
Given that __start_rodata_section_aligned will always be less than
__init_begin, is there any reason not to make the above end at
__start_rodata_section_aligned, thereby allowing more of the read-only
data (in the case of DEBUG_ALIGN_RODATA=n) or all of the read-only
data (in the case of DEBUG_ALIGN_RODATA=y) to remain write-protected?
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 8.8Mbps down 630kbps up
According to speedtest.net: 8.21Mbps down 510kbps up
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-05 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-08-23 17:58 Steven Rostedt
2017-08-23 18:20 ` Matthias Reichl
2017-08-23 18:48 ` Kees Cook
2017-08-23 19:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-05 11:47 ` Matthias Reichl
2017-12-05 13:14 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-12-05 13:23 ` Matthias Reichl
2017-12-05 13:30 ` Phil Elwell
2017-12-05 13:36 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-12-05 19:35 ` Kees Cook
2017-12-05 20:09 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2017-12-05 20:14 ` Kees Cook
2018-06-29 14:47 ` Matthias Reichl
2018-06-29 15:16 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-06-29 17:29 ` Matthias Reichl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171205200935.GY10595@n2100.armlinux.org.uk \
--to=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=eric@anholt.net \
--cc=hias@horus.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=phil@raspberrypi.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stefan.wahren@i2se.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®