From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753773AbdLGR66 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:58:58 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:36068 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750939AbdLGR65 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 12:58:57 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 10:58:55 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Elena Reshetova Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, keescook@chromium.org, david@fromorbit.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] docs: refcount_t documentation Message-ID: <20171207105855.0db6a7f8@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <1512470795-22626-1-git-send-email-elena.reshetova@intel.com> References: <1512470795-22626-1-git-send-email-elena.reshetova@intel.com> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 5 Dec 2017 12:46:35 +0200 Elena Reshetova wrote: > Some functions from refcount_t API provide different > memory ordering guarantees that their atomic counterparts. > This adds a document outlining these differences ( > Documentation/core-api/refcount-vs-atomic.rst) as well as > some other minor improvements. This seems generally good to me. Did you want me to take it through the docs tree (including the refcount.h change) or did you have some other path in mind? Thanks, jon