mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@wp.pl>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits()
Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 15:59:33 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171212155933.03c88eab@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171212234856.GZ21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Tue, 12 Dec 2017 23:48:56 +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 12:04:09PM -0800, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> 
> > > static __always_inline u64 mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask)
> > > {
> > > 	return mask & (mask ^ (mask - 1));
> > > }  
> 
> D'oh.  Even simpler than that, of course -
> 
> static __always_inline u64 mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask)
> {
>  	return mask & -mask;
> }
> 
> > Very nice!  The compilation-time check if the value can fit in a field
> > covered by the mask (if they're both known) did help me catch bugs
> > early a few times over the years, so if it could be preserved we can
> > maybe even drop the FIELD_* macros and just use this approach?  
> 
> Umm...  Something like this, perhaps?  Same bunch, plus u{16,32,64}_...
> variants for host-endian.  Adding sanity check on mask is also not
> hard, but I don't know how useful it actually is...

Sanity checking the mask is not that useful in my experience.

> diff --git a/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h b/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
> index 451aaa0786ae..a032de9aa03d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
> +++ b/include/linux/byteorder/generic.h
> @@ -187,4 +187,36 @@ static inline void be32_to_cpu_array(u32 *dst, const __be32 *src, size_t len)
>  		dst[i] = be32_to_cpu(src[i]);
>  }
>  
> +extern void __compiletime_error("value doesn't fit into mask")
> +__field_overflow(void);
> +static __always_inline u64 mask_to_multiplier(u64 mask)
> +{
> +	return mask & -mask;
> +}
> +
> +#define ____MAKE_OP(type,base,to,from)					\
> +static __always_inline __##type type##_replace_bits(__##type old,	\
> +					base val, base mask)		\
> +{									\
> +	__##type m = to(mask);						\
> +        if (__builtin_constant_p(val) &&				\

Is the lack of a __builtin_constant_p(mask) test intentional?  Sometimes
the bitfield is a packed array and people may have a helper to which
only the mask is passed as non-constant and the value is implied by the
helper, thus constant.

> +		    (val & ~(mask/mask_to_multiplier(mask))))		\
> +				    __field_overflow();			\
> +	return (old & ~m) |						\
> +		(to(val * mask_to_multiplier(mask)) & m);		\
> +}									\
> +static __always_inline base type##_get_bits(__##type v, base mask)	\
> +{									\
> +	return (from(v) & mask)/mask_to_multiplier(mask);		\
> +}
> +#define __MAKE_OP(size)							\
> +	____MAKE_OP(le##size,u##size,cpu_to_le##size,le##size##_to_cpu)	\
> +	____MAKE_OP(be##size,u##size,cpu_to_be##size,be##size##_to_cpu)	\
> +	____MAKE_OP(u##size,u##size,,)
> +__MAKE_OP(16)
> +__MAKE_OP(32)
> +__MAKE_OP(64)
> +#undef __MAKE_OP
> +#undef ____MAKE_OP
> +
>  #endif /* _LINUX_BYTEORDER_GENERIC_H */

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-13  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20171210045326.GO21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
     [not found] ` <420a198d-61f8-81cf-646d-10446cb41def@synopsys.com>
     [not found]   ` <20171211050520.GV21978@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
2017-12-11  5:38     ` [RFC][PATCH] apparent big-endian bugs in dwc-xlgmac Al Viro
2017-12-11  6:46       ` Jie Deng
2017-12-11 15:54       ` [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits() Al Viro
2017-12-12  4:02         ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-12  6:20           ` Al Viro
2017-12-12 19:45             ` Al Viro
2017-12-12 20:04               ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-12 23:48                 ` Al Viro
2017-12-12 23:59                   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2017-12-13  0:36                     ` Al Viro
2017-12-13  1:04                       ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-13  1:30                         ` Al Viro
2017-12-13  1:35                           ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-13  1:51                             ` Al Viro
2017-12-13  2:44                               ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-13 14:22                                 ` Al Viro
2017-12-13 17:45                                   ` Al Viro
2017-12-15  2:33                                     ` [RFC][PATCH] Add primitives for manipulating bitfields both in host- and fixed-endian Al Viro
2017-12-15  5:07                                       ` Jakub Kicinski
2017-12-15  5:34                                         ` Al Viro
2017-12-15 16:48                                           ` [RFC][PATCH v2] " Al Viro
2017-12-13 19:04                                   ` [RFC][PATCH] new byteorder primitives - ..._{replace,get}_bits() Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171212155933.03c88eab@cakuba.netronome.com \
    --to=kubakici@wp.pl \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®