From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCHv6 00/12] printk: introduce printing kernel thread
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2017 15:27:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171214142709.trgl76hbcdwaczzd@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171204134825.7822-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com>
On Mon 2017-12-04 22:48:13, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> RFC
>
> A new version, yet another rework. Lots of changes, e.g. hand off
> control based on Steven's patch. Another change is that this time around
> we finally have a kernel module to test printk offloading (YAYY!). The
> module tests a bunch use cases; we also have trace printk events to...
> trace offloading.
Ah, I know that it was me who was pessimistic about Steven's approach[1]
and persuaded you that offloading idea was still alive. But I am less
sure now.
My three main concerns about Steven's approach were:
1. I was afraid that it might introduce new type of deadlocks.
But it seems that it is quite safe after all.
2. Steven's code, implementing the hand shake, is far from trivial.
Few people were confused and reported false bugs.
But the basic idea is pretty simple and straightforward. If
we manage to encapsulate it into few helpers, it might become
rather self-contained and maintainable. In each case, the needed
changes are much smaller than I expected.
3. Soft-lockups are still theoretically possible with Steven's
approach.
But it seems to be quite efficient in many real life scenarios,
including Tetsuo's stress testing. Or am I wrong?
Therefore I tend to give Steven's solution a chance before this
combined approach.
In each case, I do not feel comfortable with this combined solution.
I know that it might work much better that the two approaches
alone. But it has the complexity and possible risks of both
implementations. I would prefer to go with smaller steps.
[1] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20171108102723.602216b1@gandalf.local.home
> I'll post the testing script and test module in reply
> to this mail. So... let's have some progress ;) The code is not completely
> awesome, but not tremendously difficult at the same time. We can verify
> the approach/design (we have tests and traces now) first and then start
> improving the code.
The testing module and code is great. Thanks a lot for posting it.
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-14 14:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-04 13:48 Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCHv6 01/12] printk: move printk_pending out of per-cpu Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCHv6 02/12] printk: introduce printing kernel thread Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCHv6 03/12] printk: consider watchdogs thresholds for offloading Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCHv6 04/12] printk: add sync printk_emergency API Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCHv6 05/12] printk: enable printk offloading Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCHv6 06/12] PM: switch between printk emergency modes Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCHv6 07/12] printk: register syscore notifier Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCHv6 08/12] printk: force printk_kthread to offload printing Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCHv6 09/12] printk: do not cond_resched() when we can offload Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCHv6 10/12] printk: move offloading logic to per-cpu Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCHv6 11/12] printk: add offloading watchdog API Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:48 ` [RFC][PATCHv6 12/12] printk: improve printk offloading mechanism Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:53 ` [PATCH 0/4] printk: offloading testing module/trace events Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] printk/lib: add offloading trace events and test_printk module Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:53 ` [PATCH 2/4] printk/lib: simulate slow consoles Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:53 ` [PATCH 3/4] printk: add offloading takeover traces Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-04 13:53 ` [PATCH 4/4] printk: add task name and CPU to console messages Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-14 14:27 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2017-12-14 14:39 ` [RFC][PATCHv6 00/12] printk: introduce printing kernel thread Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-15 15:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-14 15:25 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-14 17:55 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-14 18:11 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-14 18:21 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-22 0:09 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-22 4:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-28 6:48 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-28 10:07 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-29 13:59 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-31 1:44 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-01-09 20:06 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-09 22:08 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-09 22:17 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-11 11:14 ` Tetsuo Handa
2018-01-09 22:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-01-09 22:17 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-09 22:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-01-09 22:53 ` Tejun Heo
2018-01-10 7:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-01-10 14:04 ` Tejun Heo
2017-12-15 2:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-15 3:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-15 5:06 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-15 6:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-15 15:39 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-15 8:31 ` Petr Mladek
2017-12-15 8:42 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-15 9:08 ` Petr Mladek
2017-12-15 15:47 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-18 9:36 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-18 10:36 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-18 12:35 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-18 13:51 ` Petr Mladek
2017-12-18 13:31 ` Petr Mladek
2017-12-18 13:39 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-18 14:13 ` Petr Mladek
2017-12-18 17:46 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-19 1:03 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-19 1:08 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-19 1:24 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-19 2:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-19 2:46 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-19 3:38 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-19 4:58 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-19 14:40 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-20 7:46 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-19 14:31 ` Michal Hocko
2017-12-20 7:10 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-20 12:06 ` Tetsuo Handa
2017-12-21 6:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-19 4:36 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-18 14:10 ` Petr Mladek
2017-12-19 1:09 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-15 15:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-15 15:19 ` Steven Rostedt
2017-12-19 0:52 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-12-19 1:03 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-01-05 2:54 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171214142709.trgl76hbcdwaczzd@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky.work@gmail.com \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®