mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Thomas-Mich Richter <tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	mhiramat@kernel.org
Subject: Re: Linux 4.15.0-rc3 perf probe/uprobe issue with address randomization
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 15:21:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171215142153.nty3ymz2r2exawes@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8402bed0-bb40-53dc-faf8-bd26f6997de5@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Fri, Dec 15, 2017 at 03:14:37PM +0100, Thomas-Mich Richter wrote:
> During debugging of perf probe tool I discovered an issue with
> uprobes and address randomization.
> 
> To set a uprobe on a function named inet_pton in libc library, you
> obtain the address of the symbol inet_pton using command nm and
> then use the following command to set the uprobe:
> 
> # echo "p:probe_libc/inet_pton /usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so:0x142060"
> 	> /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
> 
> 0x142060 is the address of inet_pton on my system.
> This works nicely and the uprobe is usable.
> 
> The issue is with the output:
> # cat /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
> p:probe_libc/inet_pton /usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so:0x000000002d0f8952
> #
> 
> The displayed address 0x000000002d0f8952 is wrong, probably
> randomized and post processing of this output with the perf
> probe tool fails due to this random address:
> 
> # linux/tools/perf/perf probe -l
> Failed to find debug information for address 2d0f8952
>   probe_libc:inet_pton (on 0x2d0f8952 in /usr/lib64/libc-2.26.so)
> # 
> 
> So how to fix this (if at all)?
> Is replacing %p by %llx in line 612 of file kernel/trace/trace_uprobe.c
>    seq_printf(m, "0x%p", (void *)tu->offset)
> an option?
> Or is this broken by design and intention?

So recently %p got changed to hash pointers in order to avoid leaking
kernel addresses.

  ad67b74d2469 ("printk: hash addresses printed with %p")

I'm not sure what privilidges are required for reading that kprobe
state, but I suspect its root only, so changing this to %px might be
what is needed.

  reply	other threads:[~2017-12-15 14:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-15 14:14 Thomas-Mich Richter
2017-12-15 14:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2017-12-15 15:11   ` Thomas-Mich Richter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171215142153.nty3ymz2r2exawes@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=schwidefsky@de.ibm.com \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®