mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@codeblueprint.co.uk>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] sched: Comment on why sync wakeups try to run on the current CPU
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 09:43:26 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171218094327.19562-4-mgorman@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171218094327.19562-1-mgorman@techsingularity.net>

The sync wakeup logic in wake_affine_idle deserves a short description.

Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c | 5 +++++
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 392e08b364bd..95b1145bc38d 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -5737,6 +5737,11 @@ wake_affine_idle(int this_cpu, int prev_cpu, int sync)
 static int
 wake_affine_sync(int this_cpu, int sync)
 {
+	/*
+	 * Consider stacking tasks if it's a sync wakeup and there is only
+	 * one task on the runqueue. sync wakesups are expected to sleep
+	 * either immediately or shortly after the wakeup.
+	 */
 	if (sync && cpu_rq(this_cpu)->nr_running == 1)
 		return this_cpu;
 
-- 
2.15.0

  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-12-18  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-12-18  9:43 [PATCH 0/4] Reduce scheduler migrations due to wake_affine Mel Gorman
2017-12-18  9:43 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched: Only immediately migrate tasks due to interrupts if prev and target CPUs share cache Mel Gorman
2017-12-18  9:43 ` [PATCH 2/4] sched: Allow a wakee to run on the prev_cpu if it is idle and cache-affine with the waker Mel Gorman
2017-12-18 10:26   ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-18 10:56     ` Mel Gorman
2017-12-18 10:59       ` Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-18  9:43 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2017-12-19 19:06   ` [PATCH 3/4] sched: Comment on why sync wakeups try to run on the current CPU Peter Zijlstra
2017-12-19 20:25     ` Mel Gorman
2017-12-20  4:09     ` Mike Galbraith
2017-12-20  4:21       ` Mike Galbraith
2017-12-18  9:43 ` [PATCH 4/4] sched: Allow tasks to stack with a workqueue on the same CPU Mel Gorman
2017-12-18 10:44   ` Mike Galbraith
2017-12-18 11:25     ` Mel Gorman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171218094327.19562-4-mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matt@codeblueprint.co.uk \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome