From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S937331AbdLRRYN (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:24:13 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:58746 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S935198AbdLRRYI (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:24:08 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3391D20853 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=sre@kernel.org Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 18:24:04 +0100 From: Sebastian Reichel To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: Julia Lawall , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Joe Perches , LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: tps65090-charger: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in two functions Message-ID: <20171218172404.3nqyza4ml5oofykn@earth> References: <1513450432.4647.47.camel@perches.com> <4beb0d2e-adf6-5eeb-43c7-7829d54c6656@users.sourceforge.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j2gf7rgxtkc7secp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171027 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --j2gf7rgxtkc7secp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 09:47:34PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> I am still waiting for possibilities to improve also the corresponding > >> reference documentation somehow as you know it already. > >=20 > > If you require someone else to update the documentation to be able to > > explain why the patch is useful, >=20 > My approach is to refer to the Linux allocation failure report. >=20 >=20 > > then it would seem that you do not know why the patch is useful, > > and thus should not submit it. >=20 > We tried to clarify other explanation approaches a few times. >=20 > But it seems that we are stuck with specific software aspects. > How would you like to see remaining open issues to be resolved > there anyhow? FYI: I will drop this and (without any further notice) all future patches from you, that do no follow the documented process in Documentation/process/. -- Sebastian --j2gf7rgxtkc7secp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE72YNB0Y/i3JqeVQT2O7X88g7+poFAlo3+asACgkQ2O7X88g7 +pqL0g//Z7T/gG/Yp/8W8pShe9T37MQgzqAVqCxhqng7oTPO19+ibs1gHidnkgRT oh+Qn4js8icw11qPZCkGI7hYMJ2ggJldQ3aZOWCsRCoFbefn0dmcN7Jr1dNBi0QM QgOIisF2tVne4lvX9kk1fTDp5FscTjRJGqCkgLZ2ENzfWo5TZicaHwIp07yGeL8d q3pplqt9rpS3uPMuHBO/JlRGC7kxVIr82mgU8ifW8LTbVIqQkfE4DxT8Nsh01ocK 1hgGksBNP6nGFIS/ohzRQ1QIEbrkxCoDlAdsDdZraOkM04RTKawOUjdkxviI/lwj cOY0AcYibzMq3N/UGOh2+uZnAdzvJva8Qqp2REfUKAY1tlH/Te31f8M4BAz2XEt0 NZUTRQeJw5TXPrhDbzX35xQKSJ15Dik0NkHSrlK/0EC5dbJKRKgt/vSOexIjsO3p pjneZBcGgRDHHl85vT9ypM4WziMC3YbGnj/1r8WoBPRlN5inJP1wCJHu55t1Y3le UdMrt8oxktwjO66LRd6ccc3d0AcI/Dr4dpgvQxSsSH4EESKWrlGQ3+36QgGw4wqS ZBpU6LQ3Ph49AmdxGcDikCqOwnQuQZ35t5xK/1wEIbpmGjyZOtf7B4OwpjqA94Vs aDuY9Y4DrkTAq1jFkmelHHgTvBdGwNkGb400hzHQq3y783ZDDUQ= =xh8M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --j2gf7rgxtkc7secp--