From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752808AbdLUKzs (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Dec 2017 05:55:48 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:56965 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751166AbdLUKzp (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Dec 2017 05:55:45 -0500 Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2017 21:55:42 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the tip tree Message-ID: <20171221215542.6bfb63a7@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20171220070651.2816be29@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Thomas, On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 11:25:18 +0100 (CET) Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > On Wed, 20 Dec 2017, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > Commit > > > > 44d5c715330c ("x86/mm: Create asm/invpcid.h") > > > > is missing a Signed-off-by from its committer. > > Yes. That's from the PTI work in progress branch. It was high flux so we > did not care much about those details and the patches went back and forth > between various people. So if we would have done that by the book we'd have > something like. > > SOB: tglx > SOB: peterz > SOB: mingo > SOB: tglx > SOB: mingo > SOB: tglx > > We'll clean that up for the final version Then it should not be in linux-next ... linux-next is *not* a development tree. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell