From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755696AbdLUXFT (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:05:19 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:47279 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755207AbdLUXFP (ORCPT ); Thu, 21 Dec 2017 18:05:15 -0500 Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 10:05:13 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Santosh Shilimkar , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , ARM Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Marek Szyprowski Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the samsung-krzk tree with the keystone tree Message-ID: <20171222100513.79b0d3c6@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20171204094558.19b80b4d@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20171204094558.19b80b4d@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi all, On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 09:45:58 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Today's linux-next merge of the samsung-krzk tree got a conflict in: > > arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > > between commit: > > f15187dcdbcd ("ARM: config: sync multi-v7 config with keystone peripherals") > > from the keystone tree and commit: > > 453c63073185 ("ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable missing drivers for supported Exynos boards") > > from the samsung-krzk tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > > diff --cc arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > index 6f2343e259f7,833892568d31..000000000000 > --- a/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > +++ b/arch/arm/configs/multi_v7_defconfig > @@@ -558,7 -583,8 +559,9 @@@ CONFIG_VIDEO_STI_DELTA= > CONFIG_VIDEO_RENESAS_JPU=m > CONFIG_VIDEO_RENESAS_VSP1=m > CONFIG_V4L_TEST_DRIVERS=y > +CONFIG_VIDEO_VIVID=m > + CONFIG_CEC_PLATFORM_DRIVERS=y > + CONFIG_VIDEO_SAMSUNG_S5P_CEC=m > # CONFIG_MEDIA_SUBDRV_AUTOSELECT is not set > CONFIG_VIDEO_ADV7180=m > CONFIG_VIDEO_ML86V7667=m > @@@ -582,16 -613,12 +585,17 @@@ CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_DU= > CONFIG_DRM_RCAR_LVDS=y > CONFIG_DRM_SUN4I=m > CONFIG_DRM_TEGRA=y > +CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SIMPLE=y > CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SAMSUNG_LD9040=m > CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SAMSUNG_S6E8AA0=m > -CONFIG_DRM_PANEL_SIMPLE=y > +CONFIG_DRM_DUMB_VGA_DAC=m > +CONFIG_DRM_NXP_PTN3460=m > +CONFIG_DRM_PARADE_PS8622=m > +CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7511=m > +CONFIG_DRM_I2C_ADV7511_AUDIO=y > + CONFIG_DRM_SII9234=m > CONFIG_DRM_STI=m > -CONFIG_DRM_VC4=y > +CONFIG_DRM_VC4=m > CONFIG_FB_ARMCLCD=y > CONFIG_FB_EFI=y > CONFIG_FB_WM8505=y > @@@ -626,9 -655,10 +630,10 @@@ CONFIG_SND_SOC_SAMSUNG= > CONFIG_SND_SOC_SAMSUNG_SMDK_WM8994=m > CONFIG_SND_SOC_SMDK_WM8994_PCM=m > CONFIG_SND_SOC_SNOW=m > + CONFIG_SND_SOC_ODROID=m > CONFIG_SND_SOC_SH4_FSI=m > CONFIG_SND_SOC_RCAR=m > -CONFIG_SND_SIMPLE_SCU_CARD=m > +CONFIG_SND_SOC_STI=m > CONFIG_SND_SUN4I_CODEC=m > CONFIG_SND_SOC_TEGRA=m > CONFIG_SND_SOC_TEGRA20_I2S=m This is now a conflict between the arm-soc and keystone trees (I think). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell