From: Alexandru Chirvasitu <achirvasub@gmail.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: PROBLEM: consolidated IDT invalidation causes kexec to reboot
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 23:41:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171227044114.GD1410@arch-chirva.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CA+55aFzU8tRSuCoS2TmXjGZ5WRUzMCrG6Jk4eNCQZjP+5sVE9w@mail.gmail.com>
Sounds like it's been pinned down then. Just confirming this:
On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 06:16:37PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 26, 2017 at 3:19 PM, Alexandru Chirvasitu
> <achirvasub@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > I went back to the initial problematic commit e802a51 and modified it as you suggest:
>
> Thank you.
>
> > This did not work out for me, but now it fails differently. Both
> > (kexec -l + kexec -e) and (kexec -p + echo c > /proc/sysrq-trigger)
> > end in call traces and freezes.
> >
> > It does seem to be tied to idt_invalidate. One of the last things I
> > see on the screen (which is ends up frozen with the computer inactive)
> > is
> >
> > EIP: idt_invalidate+0x6/0x40 SS:ESP: 0068:f6c47cd0
>
> Yes, interesting, it's the stack canary load access there:
>
> mov %gs:0x14,%edx
>
> that traps.
>
> And that actually makes a lot of sense: the load_segments() call just
> above has rloaded all segments with __KERNEL_DS.
>
> So while the stack canary access *intends* to load it from the magic
> stack canary segment (offset 0x14), we've just reset all segments to
> the standard zero-based full-sized ones, and obviously that will take
> a page fault at 0x14.
>
> And the reason you now actually *see* the page fault is that we
> haven't completely buggered the CPU state now, so the trap handler
> actually works. With the GDT reset before, it used to take that same
> trap, but now the trap handler itself would fault, and cause a triple
> fault - which resets the machine.
>
> So it wasn't actually tracing, it was the stack canary all along. So
> at least it's truly root-caused now.
>
> But the fix is the same: we just can't afford to do any function calls.
>
> Alternatively, we should just fix that insane "load_segments()". I'm
> not sure why the code insists on reloading the segments in the first
> place.
>
> So you could try just to remove the "load_segments()" line entirely.
>
This works. The kernel that was showing me the page fault, with the
load_segments line removed from machine_kexec_32, has no issues
now. This is the diff to that prior commit:
--------------------------------------------------------
remove load_segments line from kexec
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c
index 71bd3c0..7d5e655 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/machine_kexec_32.c
@@ -218,17 +218,6 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *image)
<< PAGE_SHIFT);
/*
- * The segment registers are funny things, they have both a
- * visible and an invisible part. Whenever the visible part is
- * set to a specific selector, the invisible part is loaded
- * with from a table in memory. At no other time is the
- * descriptor table in memory accessed.
- *
- * I take advantage of this here by force loading the
- * segments, before I zap the gdt with an invalid value.
- */
- load_segments();
- /*
* The gdt & idt are now invalid.
* If you want to load them you must set up your own idt & gdt.
*/
--------------------------------------------------------
> Thanks for spending the time testing things out,
>
Well, it sure as hell is nothing if not instructive. My pleasure.
Alex
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-27 4:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-24 1:44 Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-24 3:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-24 7:28 ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-24 11:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-24 15:27 ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-24 16:40 ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-25 9:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-25 14:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-12-25 21:29 ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-26 18:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-26 19:26 ` hpa
2017-12-26 23:19 ` Alexandru Chirvasitu
2017-12-26 23:39 ` hpa
2017-12-26 23:40 ` hpa
2017-12-26 23:45 ` hpa
2017-12-27 2:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-27 2:25 ` hpa
2017-12-27 2:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-27 3:00 ` hpa
2017-12-28 1:30 ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2017-12-27 4:41 ` Alexandru Chirvasitu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171227044114.GD1410@arch-chirva.localdomain \
--to=achirvasub@gmail.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®