From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Alexander Tsoy <alexander@tsoy.me>
Cc: "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@amacapital.net>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Toralf Förster" <toralf.foerster@gmx.de>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 4.14.9 doesn't boot (regression)
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2017 11:57:46 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171230175746.5snazk5sem4ribk6@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171230170946.ywnkxkeolwk3jm6w@treble>
On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 11:09:46AM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 11:45:13AM +0300, Alexander Tsoy wrote:
> > В Пт, 29/12/2017 в 21:49 -0600, Josh Poimboeuf пишет:
> > > On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 05:10:35PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > > > (Also, Josh, the oops code should have printed the contents of the
> > > > struct pt_regs at the top of the DF stack. Any idea why it
> > > > didn't?)
> > >
> > > Looking at one of the dumps:
> > >
> > > [ 392.774879] NMI backtrace for cpu 0
> > > [ 392.774881] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.14.9-gentoo
> > > #1
> > > [ 392.774881] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM, BIOS 0.5.1 01/01/2011
> > > [ 392.774882] task: ffff8802368b8000 task.stack: ffffc9000000c000
> > > [ 392.774885] RIP: 0010:double_fault+0x0/0x30
> > > [ 392.774886] RSP: 0000:ffffffffff527fd0 EFLAGS: 00000086
> > > [ 392.774887] RAX: 000000003fc00000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX:
> > > 00000000c0000101
> > > [ 392.774887] RDX: 00000000ffff8802 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI:
> > > ffffffffff527f58
> > > [ 392.774887] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
> > > 0000000000000000
> > > [ 392.774888] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
> > > ffffffff816ae726
> > > [ 392.774888] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
> > > 0000000000000000
> > > [ 392.774889] FS: 0000000000000000(0000)
> > > GS:ffff88023fc00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > > [ 392.774889] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > > [ 392.774890] CR2: ffffffffff526f08 CR3: 0000000235b48002 CR4:
> > > 00000000001606f0
> > > [ 392.774892] Call Trace:
> > > [ 392.774894] <#DF>
> > > [ 392.774897] do_double_fault+0xb/0x140
> > > [ 392.774898] </#DF>
> > >
> > > It should have at least printed the #DF iret frame registers, which I
> > > recently added support for in "x86/unwinder: Handle stack overflows
> > > more
> > > gracefully", which is in both 4.14.9 and 4.15-rc5.
> > >
> > > I think the missing iret regs are due to a bug in
> > > show_trace_log_lvl(),
> > > where if the unwind starts with two regs frames in a row, the second
> > > regs don't get printed.
> > >
> > > Alexander, would you mind reproducing again with the below patch? It
> > > should still fail, but this time it should hopefully show another
> > > RIP/RSP/EFLAGS instead of the "do_double_fault+0xb/0x140" line.
> > >
> >
> > Yes, it works:
> >
> > [ 23.058064] NMI backtrace for cpu 2
> > [ 23.058068] CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: init Not tainted 4.15.0-rc5+ #1
> > [ 23.058069] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),
> > BIOS 1.10.2-1.fc27 04/01/2014
> > [ 23.058074] RIP: 0010:double_fault+0x0/0x30
> > [ 23.058075] RSP: 0000:fffffe800005ffd0 EFLAGS: 00000086
> > [ 23.058077] RAX: 000000003fd00000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX:
> > 00000000c0000101
> > [ 23.058077] RDX: 00000000ffff9681 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI:
> > fffffe800005ff58
> > [ 23.058078] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
> > 0000000000000000
> > [ 23.058079] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
> > ffffffff92001426
> > [ 23.058080] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
> > 0000000000000000
> > [ 23.058083] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff96813fd00000(0000)
> > knlGS:0000000000000000
> > [ 23.058084] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > [ 23.058085] CR2: fffffe800005ef08 CR3: 0000000137a09000 CR4:
> > 00000000000406a0
> > [ 23.058089] Call Trace:
> > [ 23.058101] <#DF>
> > [ 23.058104] RIP: 0010:do_double_fault+0xb/0x140
> > [ 23.058105] RSP: 0000:fffffe800005ef18 EFLAGS: 00010086 ORIG_RAX:
> > 0000000000000000
> > [ 23.058106] RAX: 000000003fd00000 RBX: 0000000000000001 RCX:
> > 00000000c0000101
> > [ 23.058107] RDX: 00000000ffff9681 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI:
> > fffffe800005ff58
> > [ 23.058107] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09:
> > 0000000000000000
> > [ 23.058108] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12:
> > ffffffff92001426
> > [ 23.058108] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 0000000000000000 R15:
> > 0000000000000000
> > [ 23.058111] </#DF>
> > [ 23.058111] Code: 05 00 00 48 89 e7 31 f6 e8 2e 8c 61 ff e9 69 06 00
> > 00 e8 94 05 00 00 48 89 e7 31 f6 e8 1a 8c 61 ff e9 55 06 00 00 0f 1f 44
> > 00 00 <0f> 1f 00 48 83 c4 88 e8 e4 04 00 00 48 89 e7 48 8b 74 24 78 48
>
> That's better indeed, though still not quite right. It should have only
> shown a subset of those registers. One more bug to fix there...
Turns out my previous code to print iret frames was a bit ... misguided,
to put it nicely. Not sure what I was smoking.
Hopefully the below patch should fix it (in place of the previous
patch). Would you mind testing again?
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h
index c1688c2d0a12..1f86e1b0a5cd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/unwind.h
@@ -56,18 +56,27 @@ void unwind_start(struct unwind_state *state, struct task_struct *task,
#if defined(CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC) || defined(CONFIG_UNWINDER_FRAME_POINTER)
/*
- * WARNING: The entire pt_regs may not be safe to dereference. In some cases,
- * only the iret frame registers are accessible. Use with caution!
+ * If 'partial' returns true, only the iret frame registers are valid.
*/
-static inline struct pt_regs *unwind_get_entry_regs(struct unwind_state *state)
+static inline struct pt_regs *unwind_get_entry_regs(struct unwind_state *state,
+ bool *partial)
{
if (unwind_done(state))
return NULL;
+ if (partial) {
+#ifdef CONFIG_UNWINDER_ORC
+ *partial = !state->full_regs;
+#else
+ *partial = false;
+#endif
+ }
+
return state->regs;
}
#else
-static inline struct pt_regs *unwind_get_entry_regs(struct unwind_state *state)
+static inline struct pt_regs *unwind_get_entry_regs(struct unwind_state *state,
+ bool *partial)
{
return NULL;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index 36b17e0febe8..6e49d2e0c243 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -76,12 +76,11 @@ void show_iret_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
regs->sp, regs->flags);
}
-static void show_regs_safe(struct stack_info *info, struct pt_regs *regs)
+static void show_regs_full_or_partial(struct pt_regs *regs, bool partial)
{
- if (on_stack(info, regs, sizeof(*regs)))
+ if (!partial)
__show_regs(regs, 0);
- else if (on_stack(info, (void *)regs + IRET_FRAME_OFFSET,
- IRET_FRAME_SIZE)) {
+ else {
/*
* When an interrupt or exception occurs in entry code, the
* full pt_regs might not have been saved yet. In that case
@@ -98,11 +97,13 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
struct stack_info stack_info = {0};
unsigned long visit_mask = 0;
int graph_idx = 0;
+ bool partial;
printk("%sCall Trace:\n", log_lvl);
unwind_start(&state, task, regs, stack);
stack = stack ? : get_stack_pointer(task, regs);
+ regs = unwind_get_entry_regs(&state, &partial);
/*
* Iterate through the stacks, starting with the current stack pointer.
@@ -120,7 +121,7 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
* - hardirq stack
* - entry stack
*/
- for (regs = NULL; stack; stack = PTR_ALIGN(stack_info.next_sp, sizeof(long))) {
+ for ( ; stack; stack = PTR_ALIGN(stack_info.next_sp, sizeof(long))) {
const char *stack_name;
if (get_stack_info(stack, task, &stack_info, &visit_mask)) {
@@ -140,7 +141,7 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
printk("%s <%s>\n", log_lvl, stack_name);
if (regs)
- show_regs_safe(&stack_info, regs);
+ show_regs_full_or_partial(regs, partial);
/*
* Scan the stack, printing any text addresses we find. At the
@@ -164,7 +165,7 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
/*
* Don't print regs->ip again if it was already printed
- * by show_regs_safe() below.
+ * by show_regs_full_or_partial() below.
*/
if (regs && stack == ®s->ip)
goto next;
@@ -199,9 +200,9 @@ void show_trace_log_lvl(struct task_struct *task, struct pt_regs *regs,
unwind_next_frame(&state);
/* if the frame has entry regs, print them */
- regs = unwind_get_entry_regs(&state);
+ regs = unwind_get_entry_regs(&state, &partial);
if (regs)
- show_regs_safe(&stack_info, regs);
+ show_regs_full_or_partial(regs, partial);
}
if (stack_name)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
index 77835bc021c7..7dd0d2a0d142 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/stacktrace.c
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ __save_stack_trace_reliable(struct stack_trace *trace,
for (unwind_start(&state, task, NULL, NULL); !unwind_done(&state);
unwind_next_frame(&state)) {
- regs = unwind_get_entry_regs(&state);
+ regs = unwind_get_entry_regs(&state, NULL);
if (regs) {
/*
* Kernel mode registers on the stack indicate an
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-30 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-29 11:14 Toralf Förster
2017-12-29 13:33 ` Sebastian Gottschall
2017-12-29 13:38 ` Toralf Förster
2017-12-29 15:29 ` Andy Shevchenko
2017-12-29 15:48 ` Alexander Tsoy
2017-12-29 15:52 ` Toralf Förster
2017-12-29 20:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-29 20:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2017-12-29 21:02 ` Toralf Förster
2017-12-29 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-29 21:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-29 22:04 ` Alexander Tsoy
2017-12-29 22:30 ` Toralf Förster
2017-12-29 22:53 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-29 23:14 ` Toralf Förster
2017-12-30 0:10 ` Andy Lutomirski
2017-12-30 1:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-30 1:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-12-30 9:14 ` Alexander Tsoy
2017-12-30 9:21 ` Toralf Förster
2017-12-30 1:13 ` Alexander Tsoy
2017-12-30 12:58 ` Toralf Förster
2017-12-30 13:14 ` Jiri Kosina
2017-12-30 3:49 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-12-30 8:45 ` Alexander Tsoy
2017-12-30 17:09 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-12-30 17:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2017-12-30 22:03 ` Alexander Tsoy
2017-12-30 22:16 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2017-12-30 9:30 ` Toralf Förster
2017-12-30 8:32 ` Toralf Förster
2017-12-30 9:53 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20171230175746.5snazk5sem4ribk6@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander@tsoy.me \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=toralf.foerster@gmx.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®