Re: [PATCH] ACPI / sysfs: fix shift-overflow in GPE flooding quirk mechanism

["Du, Changbin" <changbin.du@intel.com>]

Hi Wysocki and Brown,
May I know wether you have checked this? Thanks!

On Fri, Dec 22, 2017 at 11:11:10PM +0800, changbin.du@intel.com wrote:
> From: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
> 
> The ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX is larger than the number of bits that u64 can
> represent. This result in shift-overflow. So actually we need a bitmap.
> 
> [    1.003153] ======================================================================
> [    1.003257] UBSAN: Undefined behaviour in drivers/acpi/sysfs.c:849:33
> [    1.003314] shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long long unsigned int'
> [    1.003381] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 4.15.0-rc4+ #40
> [    1.003436] Hardware name: LENOVO 20HAS02515/20HAS02515, BIOS N1VET36W (1.26 ) 10/03/2017
> [    1.003504] Call Trace:
> [    1.003542]  dump_stack+0xe3/0x177
> [    1.003582]  ? _atomic_dec_and_lock+0x219/0x219
> [    1.003653]  ubsan_epilogue+0xd/0x4e
> [    1.003695]  __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x1f8/0x23d
> [    1.003754]  ? __ubsan_handle_load_invalid_value+0x13b/0x13b
> [    1.003817]  ? trace_hardirqs_on_caller+0x1f3/0x370
> [    1.003868]  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
> [    1.003917]  ? up+0xe9/0x160
> [    1.003957]  ? sugov_should_update_freq+0xa1/0x1f0
> [    1.004000]  ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
> [    1.004000]  acpi_gpe_apply_masked_gpes+0xa4/0x125
> [    1.004000]  ? acpi_gpe_apply_masked_gpes+0xa4/0x125
> [    1.004000]  ? acpi_gpe_set_masked_gpes+0xe3/0xe3
> [    1.004000]  ? acpi_get_table+0x111/0x127
> [    1.004000]  acpi_scan_init+0x299/0x598
> [    1.004000]  ? acpi_match_madt+0xae/0xae
> [    1.004000]  ? sysfs_add_file_mode_ns+0x160/0x320
> [    1.004000]  ? kobject_put+0x23/0x220
> [    1.004000]  ? bus_create_file+0x75/0x90
> [    1.004000]  ? bus_register+0x44a/0x540
> [    1.004000]  ? subsys_register.part.1+0x140/0x140
> [    1.004000]  acpi_init+0x532/0x5d8
> [    1.004000]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x36/0x36
> [    1.004000]  ? console_trylock+0x60/0x60
> [    1.004000]  ? sysfs_add_file_mode_ns+0x160/0x320
> [    1.004000]  ? sysfs_create_file_ns+0x56/0x80
> [    1.004000]  ? video_setup+0x13c/0x13c
> [    1.004000]  ? fb_console_init+0x16c/0x1fc
> [    1.004000]  ? acpi_sleep_proc_init+0x36/0x36
> [    1.004000]  do_one_initcall+0xae/0x282
> [    1.004000]  ? initcall_blacklisted+0x1c0/0x1c0
> [    1.004000]  ? up_write+0x92/0x100
> [    1.004000]  ? down_write_nested+0x110/0x110
> [    1.004000]  ? kasan_unpoison_shadow+0x35/0x50
> [    1.004000]  kernel_init_freeable+0x4af/0x573
> [    1.004000]  ? start_kernel+0x6b1/0x6b1
> [    1.004000]  ? rest_init+0x100/0x100
> [    1.004000]  kernel_init+0x13/0x13d
> [    1.004000]  ? rest_init+0x100/0x100
> [    1.004000]  ? rest_init+0x100/0x100
> [    1.004000]  ret_from_fork+0x24/0x30
> [    1.004000] ======================================================================
> 
> Fixes: 9c4aa1eecb48 ("ACPI / sysfs: Provide quirk mechanism to prevent GPE flooding")
> Signed-off-by: Changbin Du <changbin.du@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/sysfs.c | 7 ++++---
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c b/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
> index 06a150b..60ade0b 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/sysfs.c
> @@ -823,7 +823,7 @@ static ssize_t counter_set(struct kobject *kobj,
>   */
>  #define ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX	0x80
>  
> -static u64 __initdata acpi_masked_gpes;
> +static __initdata DECLARE_BITMAP(acpi_masked_gpes, ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX);
>  
>  static int __init acpi_gpe_set_masked_gpes(char *val)
>  {
> @@ -831,7 +831,8 @@ static int __init acpi_gpe_set_masked_gpes(char *val)
>  
>  	if (kstrtou8(val, 0, &gpe) || gpe > ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> -	acpi_masked_gpes |= ((u64)1<<gpe);
> +
> +	set_bit(gpe, acpi_masked_gpes);
>  
>  	return 1;
>  }
> @@ -846,7 +847,7 @@ void __init acpi_gpe_apply_masked_gpes(void)
>  	for (gpe = 0;
>  	     gpe < min_t(u8, ACPI_MASKABLE_GPE_MAX, acpi_current_gpe_count);
>  	     gpe++) {
> -		if (acpi_masked_gpes & ((u64)1<<gpe)) {
> +		if (test_bit(gpe, acpi_masked_gpes)) {
>  			status = acpi_get_gpe_device(gpe, &handle);
>  			if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status)) {
>  				pr_info("Masking GPE 0x%x.\n", gpe);
> -- 
> 2.7.4
> 

-- 
Thanks,
Changbin Du