From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754685AbeAGVTt (ORCPT + 1 other); Sun, 7 Jan 2018 16:19:49 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:45616 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754557AbeAGVTs (ORCPT ); Sun, 7 Jan 2018 16:19:48 -0500 Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 22:19:51 +0100 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Linus Torvalds , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , Borislav Petkov , David Woodhouse , "Hansen, Dave" Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] sysfs/cpu: Add vulnerability folder Message-ID: <20180107211951.GA26115@kroah.com> References: <20180107205749.938016669@linutronix.de> <20180107210716.820339827@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180107210716.820339827@linutronix.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: On Sun, Jan 07, 2018 at 09:57:50PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > As the meltdown/spectre problem affects several CPU architectures, it makes > sense to have common way to express whether a system is affected by a > particular vulnerability or not. If affected the way to express the > mitigation should be common as well. > > Create /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities folder and files for > meltdown, spectre_v1 and spectre_v2. I like this, minor nits below: > > Allow architextures to override the show function. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > --- > drivers/base/Kconfig | 3 +++ > drivers/base/cpu.c | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/linux/cpu.h | 7 +++++++ > 3 files changed, 58 insertions(+) A Documentation/ABI/ update is needed for the new sysfs files. > +#ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_CPU_VULNERABILITIES > + > +ssize_t __weak cpu_show_meltdown(struct device *dev, > + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) > +{ > + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "Not affected\n"); sysfs is one-value-per-file, so you never need to care about the page size, a simple sprintf() is fine. No need to change if you don't want to, your call. > +} > + > +ssize_t __weak cpu_show_spectre_v1(struct device *dev, > + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) > +{ > + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "Not affected\n"); > +} > + > +ssize_t __weak cpu_show_spectre_v2(struct device *dev, > + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) > +{ > + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE - 2, "Not affected\n"); > +} > + > +static DEVICE_ATTR(meltdown, 0444, cpu_show_meltdown, NULL); > +static DEVICE_ATTR(spectre_v1, 0444, cpu_show_spectre_v1, NULL); > +static DEVICE_ATTR(spectre_v2, 0444, cpu_show_spectre_v2, NULL); DEVICE_ATTR_RO() please. Yeah, that does make the global symbols a bit different, meltdown_show() and the like. Hm, I guess this is ok, given that it's ment to be overridden. Oh, nevermind. So, just a documentation update please, that can always be an add-on patch if you promise to do it :) thanks, greg k-h