mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>,
	tglx@linutronix.de, x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org, dwmw@amazon.co.uk, pjt@google.com,
	luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, thomas.lendacky@amd.com,
	tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com, gregkh@linux-foundation.org,
	dave.hansen@intel.com, jikos@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 6/8] x86/entry/clearregs: Add number of arguments to syscall tables
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 20:37:51 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180110043751.GK6718@tassilo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CEE66310-5B09-4375-8B9F-23D9798C8295@amacapital.net>

On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 05:26:43PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> 
> 
> > On Jan 9, 2018, at 5:03 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org> wrote:
> > 
> > From: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > In order to sanitize the system call arguments properly
> > we need to know the number of syscall arguments for each
> > syscall. Add a new column to the 32bit and 64bit syscall
> > tables to list the number of arguments.
> > 
> 
> Surely we can do this in the SYSCALL_DEFINE macros.  Or at least statically check it.

Possibly. The assembler would be much uglier as inline assembler though.
And adding the number shouldn't be a big burden when adding a system call.

I don't know how to check statically.

> 
> Also, what attack are we protecting against anyway?

There's no specific attack here.

But the idea is to make it harder to inject values into the kernel to abuse
with speculation.

-Andi

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-10  4:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-10  1:03 x86/clearregs: Register sanitizing at kernel entry for speculation hygiene Andi Kleen
2018-01-10  1:03 ` [PATCH v1 1/8] x86/entry/clearregs: Remove partial stack frame in fast system call Andi Kleen
2018-01-10  2:46   ` Brian Gerst
2018-01-11  0:16     ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-11  0:54       ` Brian Gerst
2018-01-11  1:02         ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-11  0:55       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-11  1:01         ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-11  1:01         ` Brian Gerst
2018-01-11  1:22           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-11  1:47             ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-11 18:44               ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-11  2:09   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-12  3:22   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-10  1:03 ` [PATCH v1 2/8] x86/entry/clearregs: Add infrastructure to clear registers Andi Kleen
2018-01-11 19:58   ` Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
2018-01-11 20:10     ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-10  1:03 ` [PATCH v1 3/8] x86/entry/clearregs: Clear registers for 64bit SYSCALL Andi Kleen
2018-01-11  3:35   ` Brian Gerst
2018-01-11 18:47     ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-12  3:45   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-10  1:03 ` [PATCH v1 4/8] x86/entry/retpoline: Clear extra registers for compat syscalls Andi Kleen
2018-01-10  1:03 ` [PATCH v1 5/8] x86/entry/clearregs: Clear registers for 64bit exceptions/interrupts Andi Kleen
2018-01-10  1:23   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-10  1:03 ` [PATCH v1 6/8] x86/entry/clearregs: Add number of arguments to syscall tables Andi Kleen
2018-01-10  1:26   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-10  4:37     ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2018-01-10 20:05       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-10  1:03 ` [PATCH v1 7/8] x86/entry/clearregs: Add 64bit stubs to clear unused arguments regs Andi Kleen
2018-01-10  1:03 ` [PATCH v1 8/8] x86/entry/clearregs: Clear registers for 32bit kernel Andi Kleen
2018-01-10  1:24   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-10  1:16 ` x86/clearregs: Register sanitizing at kernel entry for speculation hygiene Andy Lutomirski
2018-01-10  1:34   ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-10  1:39     ` Andy Lutomirski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180110043751.GK6718@tassilo.jf.intel.com \
    --to=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw@amazon.co.uk \
    --cc=gregkh@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=jikos@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome