From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753920AbeAJVfq (ORCPT + 1 other); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:35:46 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59050 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751366AbeAJV3D (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 16:29:03 -0500 DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org AB8D52173F Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=acme@kernel.org From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ingo Molnar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Adrian Hunter , David Ahern , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Wang Nan Subject: [PATCH 02/27] perf test bpf: Use designated struct field initializers Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 18:28:19 -0300 Message-Id: <20180110212844.12441-3-acme@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.14.3 In-Reply-To: <20180110212844.12441-1-acme@kernel.org> References: <20180110212844.12441-1-acme@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To follow standard practice in the kernel sources, documenting the initialization better and helping quickly finding the value for some field in a struct with many entries. Cc: Adrian Hunter Cc: David Ahern Cc: Jiri Olsa Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Wang Nan Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-syn3hz9hz7ukxlxbx5x6hv20@git.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/tests/bpf.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c index 057c6b8fdb53..0512f1b5bfdb 100644 --- a/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c +++ b/tools/perf/tests/bpf.c @@ -63,46 +63,41 @@ static struct { bool pin; } bpf_testcase_table[] = { { - LLVM_TESTCASE_BASE, - "Basic BPF filtering", - "[basic_bpf_test]", - "fix 'perf test LLVM' first", - "load bpf object failed", - &epoll_wait_loop, - (NR_ITERS + 1) / 2, - false, + .prog_id = LLVM_TESTCASE_BASE, + .desc = "Basic BPF filtering", + .name = "[basic_bpf_test]", + .msg_compile_fail = "fix 'perf test LLVM' first", + .msg_load_fail = "load bpf object failed", + .target_func = &epoll_wait_loop, + .expect_result = (NR_ITERS + 1) / 2, }, { - LLVM_TESTCASE_BASE, - "BPF pinning", - "[bpf_pinning]", - "fix kbuild first", - "check your vmlinux setting?", - &epoll_wait_loop, - (NR_ITERS + 1) / 2, - true, + .prog_id = LLVM_TESTCASE_BASE, + .desc = "BPF pinning", + .name = "[bpf_pinning]", + .msg_compile_fail = "fix kbuild first", + .msg_load_fail = "check your vmlinux setting?", + .target_func = &epoll_wait_loop, + .expect_result = (NR_ITERS + 1) / 2, + .pin = true, }, #ifdef HAVE_BPF_PROLOGUE { - LLVM_TESTCASE_BPF_PROLOGUE, - "BPF prologue generation", - "[bpf_prologue_test]", - "fix kbuild first", - "check your vmlinux setting?", - &llseek_loop, - (NR_ITERS + 1) / 4, - false, + .prog_id = LLVM_TESTCASE_BPF_PROLOGUE, + .desc = "BPF prologue generation", + .name = "[bpf_prologue_test]", + .msg_compile_fail = "fix kbuild first", + .msg_load_fail = "check your vmlinux setting?", + .target_func = &llseek_loop, + .expect_result = (NR_ITERS + 1) / 4, }, #endif { - LLVM_TESTCASE_BPF_RELOCATION, - "BPF relocation checker", - "[bpf_relocation_test]", - "fix 'perf test LLVM' first", - "libbpf error when dealing with relocation", - NULL, - 0, - false, + .prog_id = LLVM_TESTCASE_BPF_RELOCATION, + .desc = "BPF relocation checker", + .name = "[bpf_relocation_test]", + .msg_compile_fail = "fix 'perf test LLVM' first", + .msg_load_fail = "libbpf error when dealing with relocation", }, }; -- 2.14.3