From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753712AbeAKEkg (ORCPT + 1 other); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 23:40:36 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([103.22.144.67]:38621 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752922AbeAKEke (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jan 2018 23:40:34 -0500 Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 15:40:31 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Kees Cook , David Miller , Networking Cc: Linux-Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , David Windsor , Marcelo Ricardo Leitner Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the kspp tree with the net tree Message-ID: <20180111154031.577c213b@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-Path: Hi Kees, Today's linux-next merge of the kspp tree got a conflict in: net/sctp/socket.c between commit: c76f97c99ae6 ("sctp: make use of pre-calculated len") from the net tree and commit: 3511d716f5a8 ("sctp: Copy struct sctp_sock.autoclose to userspace using put_user()") from the kspp tree. I fixed it up (I just used the latter version) and can carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell