mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>,
	Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
	Arjan Van De Ven <arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Jun Nakajima <jun.nakajima@intel.com>,
	Asit Mallick <asit.k.mallick@intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4] objtool: Implement jump_assert for _static_cpu_has()
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 17:44:30 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180115164909.836510626@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180115164428.498966552@infradead.org>

[-- Attachment #1: peterz-objtool-static_cpu_has.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3398 bytes --]

Unlike the jump_label bits, static_cpu_has is implemented with
alternatives. Sadly it doesn't readily distinguish itself from any
other alternatives.

Use a heuristic to guess at it :/

But like jump_labels, make static_cpu_has set br_static on the
instructions after the static branch such that we can assert on it.

Cc: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
 tools/objtool/check.c   |   21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 tools/objtool/special.c |   27 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 tools/objtool/special.h |    1 +
 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/tools/objtool/check.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/check.c
@@ -636,6 +636,12 @@ static int handle_group_alt(struct objto
 	fake_jump->ignore = true;
 
 	if (!special_alt->new_len) {
+		/*
+		 * The NOP case for _static_cpu_has()
+		 */
+		if (special_alt->static_feat)
+			fake_jump->jump_dest->br_static = true;
+
 		*new_insn = fake_jump;
 		return 0;
 	}
@@ -664,6 +670,21 @@ static int handle_group_alt(struct objto
 				  insn->sec, insn->offset);
 			return -1;
 		}
+
+		if (special_alt->static_feat) {
+			if (insn->type != INSN_JUMP_UNCONDITIONAL) {
+				WARN_FUNC("not an unconditional jump in _static_cpu_has()",
+					  insn->sec, insn->offset);
+			}
+			if (insn->jump_dest == fake_jump) {
+				WARN_FUNC("jump inside alternative for _static_cpu_has()",
+					  insn->sec, insn->offset);
+			}
+			/*
+			 * The JMP+disp case for _static_cpu_has()
+			 */
+			insn->jump_dest->br_static = true;
+		}
 	}
 
 	if (!last_new_insn) {
--- a/tools/objtool/special.c
+++ b/tools/objtool/special.c
@@ -41,6 +41,7 @@
 #define ALT_ORIG_LEN_OFFSET	10
 #define ALT_NEW_LEN_OFFSET	11
 
+#define X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS (3*32+21)
 #define X86_FEATURE_POPCNT (4*32+23)
 
 struct special_entry {
@@ -110,6 +111,9 @@ static int get_alt_entry(struct elf *elf
 		 */
 		if (feature == X86_FEATURE_POPCNT)
 			alt->skip_orig = true;
+
+		if (feature == X86_FEATURE_ALWAYS)
+			alt->static_feat = true;
 	}
 
 	orig_rela = find_rela_by_dest(sec, offset + entry->orig);
@@ -155,7 +159,7 @@ int special_get_alts(struct elf *elf, st
 	struct special_entry *entry;
 	struct section *sec;
 	unsigned int nr_entries;
-	struct special_alt *alt;
+	struct special_alt *alt, *last = NULL;
 	int idx, ret;
 
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(alts);
@@ -186,6 +190,27 @@ int special_get_alts(struct elf *elf, st
 				return ret;
 
 			list_add_tail(&alt->list, alts);
+
+			if (last) {
+				/*
+				 * If we have two consecutive alternatives for
+				 * the same location, for which the first has
+				 * FEATURE_ALWAYS set and the second has no
+				 * replacement, then assume this is
+				 * _static_cpu_has() and will have to set
+				 * br_static to make jump_assert work.
+				 */
+				if (alt->orig_sec == last->orig_sec &&
+				    alt->orig_off == last->orig_off &&
+				    alt->orig_len == last->orig_len &&
+				    !alt->new_len && !alt->new_sec && !alt->new_off &&
+				    last->static_feat)
+					alt->static_feat = true;
+				else
+					last->static_feat = false;
+			}
+
+			last = alt;
 		}
 	}
 
--- a/tools/objtool/special.h
+++ b/tools/objtool/special.h
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ struct special_alt {
 	bool group;
 	bool skip_orig;
 	bool jump_or_nop;
+	bool static_feat;
 
 	struct section *orig_sec;
 	unsigned long orig_off;

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-15 16:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-15 16:44 [PATCH 0/4] objtool validation of static branches Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 1/4] objtool: Implement base jump_assert support Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-15 17:39   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-15 18:00     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-15 16:44 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2018-01-15 18:04   ` [PATCH 2/4] objtool: Implement jump_assert for _static_cpu_has() Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-15 18:12     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-15 18:34       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-15 18:59         ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-15 19:08           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-15 19:11             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-15 19:15               ` Borislav Petkov
2018-01-15 20:15               ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-15 20:30                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] x86/jump_label: Implement arch_static_assert() Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-15 17:22   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-15 17:41     ` David Woodhouse
2018-01-15 17:58     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-15 18:28   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-01-15 16:44 ` [PATCH 4/4] x86: Reindent _static_cpu_has Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-15 17:15   ` Josh Poimboeuf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180115164909.836510626@infradead.org \
    --to=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=asit.k.mallick@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=dave.hansen@intel.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®