From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, lenb@kernel.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/acpi: check rsdp address received via bootparams to be valid
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2018 17:35:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180116163529.rc5j23oqmwk45rp5@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <432c21ab-24d8-1e70-a471-ad8a14357d4e@suse.com>
* Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
> On 16/01/18 16:46, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com> wrote:
> >
> >> There seem to exist several grub2 versions trashing
> >> boot_params.hdr.acpi_rsdp_addr.
> >>
> >> So don't just believe this address to be valid, but verify it pointing
> >> to a valid RSDP table.
> >
> > Exactly what kind of values do those Grub2 versions put into that field? Pointer
> > to something, or random noise?
>
> Looks like random noise. On Mike's system it was 0x000000000151.
>
> > Also, what exactly does 'validation' mean, how robustly does it filter out of spec
> > uses of the boot protocol?
>
> It validates the RSDP has the correct 8 byte eye catcher in it and
> the checksum of the structure is correct. Searching the RSDP by
> scanning memory is using the same checks, so I guess this ought to
> be okay. Odds are about 1 : 2^80 for false positives.
Ok, this should work - but only because the RSDP is defined in such a robust
fashion.
The boot protocol extension is still fragile: what I worry about is that if we
start relying on the extended boot protocol with widespread installed base of out
of spec Grub2 loaders, other extensions (which cannot be sanity checked) would be
less robust.
Is there a way to detect the broken Grub2 versions somehow and just limit the boot
protocol for them?
The other solution would be to just discontinue this boot protocol extension and
define a new one.
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-16 16:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-16 13:57 Juergen Gross
2018-01-16 15:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-16 15:56 ` Juergen Gross
2018-01-16 16:35 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2018-01-17 12:28 ` Juergen Gross
2018-01-17 15:34 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-01-17 18:12 ` Juergen Gross
2018-02-13 16:32 ` Ingo Molnar
2018-02-13 16:48 ` Juergen Gross
2018-01-17 11:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2018-01-17 12:20 ` Juergen Gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180116163529.rc5j23oqmwk45rp5@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®