From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
Cc: sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] print kdump kernel loaded status in stack dump
Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 09:57:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180117085734.jx77p3brjykk3ude@pathway.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180117045057.GA4994@dhcp-128-65.nay.redhat.com>
On Wed 2018-01-17 12:50:57, Dave Young wrote:
> It is useful to print kdump kernel loaded status in dump_stack()
> especially when panic happens so that we can differenciate
> kdump kernel early hang and a normal panic in a bug report.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Young <dyoung@redhat.com>
> ---
> kernel/printk/printk.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> --- linux-x86.orig/kernel/printk/printk.c
> +++ linux-x86/kernel/printk/printk.c
> @@ -48,6 +48,7 @@
> #include <linux/sched/clock.h>
> #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
> #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
> +#include <linux/kexec.h>
>
> #include <linux/uaccess.h>
> #include <asm/sections.h>
> @@ -3127,6 +3128,8 @@ void dump_stack_print_info(const char *l
> if (dump_stack_arch_desc_str[0] != '\0')
> printk("%sHardware name: %s\n",
> log_lvl, dump_stack_arch_desc_str);
> + if (kexec_crash_loaded())
> + printk("%skdump kernel loaded\n", log_lvl);
IMHO, it would be better to do it like for the workqueues.
I mean to call printk_kexec_info(log_lv1, current) here
that would be impletemented in kexec sources.
Then it could be maintained by kexec people.
Anyway, I wonder if the info about kexec_crash_loaded() is
enough. I am not much familiar with kexec. AFAIK,
the image might be loaded long time before it
is acutally used.
Finally, the style of the other lines is:
Name: details
I would suggest to print something like:
Kexec: details
, where the details might be whether the image is loaded,
whether the loaded kernel is being executed, and
other kexec-related flags.
How does that sound?
> print_worker_info(log_lvl, current);
> }
Best Regards,
Petr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-01-17 8:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-17 4:50 Dave Young
2018-01-17 8:57 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2018-01-17 12:32 ` Dave Young
2018-01-17 13:42 ` Petr Mladek
2018-01-17 15:48 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-01-18 1:57 ` Dave Young
2018-01-18 18:02 ` Andi Kleen
2018-01-18 18:57 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-01-19 4:47 ` Dave Young
2018-01-26 7:37 ` Dave Young
2018-01-26 12:17 ` Petr Mladek
2018-01-27 3:57 ` Dave Young
2018-01-19 5:45 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-01-19 8:16 ` Dave Young
2018-01-19 8:28 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-01-19 8:42 ` Dave Young
2018-01-19 9:46 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-01-19 8:32 ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2018-01-19 16:16 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20180117085734.jx77p3brjykk3ude@pathway.suse.cz \
--to=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®