From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753944AbeAQXOZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:14:25 -0500 Received: from mail-pg0-f67.google.com ([74.125.83.67]:41120 "EHLO mail-pg0-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753533AbeAQXOW (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Jan 2018 18:14:22 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBot1LwXE/IaaFsvCVSFnWiME8FLLX0ByOxXCB/IuqXJaK9gAab5EwV4eU0AgAXfcYxORIOOrKw== Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2018 15:14:19 -0800 From: Brian Norris To: Claudiu Beznea Cc: Andy Shevchenko , Thierry Reding , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Russell King - ARM Linux , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , Jonathan Corbet , Nicolas Ferre , Alexandre Belloni , linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-arm Mailing List , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree , Mike Dunn , Alexander Shiyan Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/16] drivers: pwm: core: use a single of xlate function Message-ID: <20180117231357.GC112833@google.com> References: <1515766983-15151-1-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <1515766983-15151-2-git-send-email-claudiu.beznea@microchip.com> <20180112183512.GB102880@google.com> <6441df76-fb4a-ce00-1019-f7ff9143b75e@microchip.com> <9a130c0b-572d-be0b-8ac7-596714208d41@microchip.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9a130c0b-572d-be0b-8ac7-596714208d41@microchip.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 10:24:59AM +0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote: > Please explain me further. From this I understand, as a general rule, > that the device tree binaries from, e.g. 3 years ago, should be > compatible with, e.g. the current version of kernel? Yes. https://www.kernel.org/doc/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ABI.txt