mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
To: Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com>
Cc: nic_swsd@realtek.com, alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	dhowells@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	will.deacon@arm.com, peterz@infradead.org,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: net: r8169: a question of memory barrier in the r8169 driver
Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2018 02:11:01 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180119011101.GA15920@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a373156-41e5-a78b-cd31-c4b9bdba2696@gmail.com>

Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@gmail.com> :
[...]
> The function rtl8169_start_xmit reads tp->dirty_tx in TX_FRAGS_READY_FOR:
>     if (unlikely(!TX_FRAGS_READY_FOR(tp, skb_shinfo(skb)->nr_frags))) {
>         netif_err(tp, drv, dev, "BUG! Tx Ring full when queue awake!\n");
>         goto err_stop_0;
>     }
> But there is no memory barrier around this code.
> 
> Is there a possible data race here?

This code would not even be needed if rtl8169_start_xmit was only your
usual ndo_start_xmit handler: Realtek {ab / re}used it for GSO handling
(see r8169_csum_workaround).

If the test is not a no-op in this GSO context, it's racy.

-- 
Ueimor

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-01-19  1:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-01-18 14:06 Jia-Ju Bai
2018-01-18 15:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-19  1:11   ` Francois Romieu
2018-01-19 17:14     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-01-20  0:00       ` Francois Romieu
2018-01-19  1:11 ` Francois Romieu [this message]
2018-01-19  1:24   ` Jia-Ju Bai
2018-01-19 23:59     ` Francois Romieu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180119011101.GA15920@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com \
    --to=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
    --cc=alexander.h.duyck@redhat.com \
    --cc=baijiaju1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nic_swsd@realtek.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®