From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751257AbeAWIdG (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:33:06 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:42833 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751156AbeAWIdE (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2018 03:33:04 -0500 Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 09:33:00 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Dave Jones , Linux Kernel Subject: Re: problematic rc9 futex changes. Message-ID: <20180123083300.GI2228@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180123053446.GA19421@codemonkey.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180123053446.GA19421@codemonkey.org.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 12:34:46AM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > c1e2f0eaf015fb: "futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex" seems to > make up a few new rules to violate. > > Coverity picked up these two problems in the same code: > Yeah, Geert also spotted it: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180122103947.GD2228@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net I've been running the robustpi tests from glibc but have so far failed to actually trigger the bug. I think I'll just write up a Changelog and post the fix from the above link.