From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751281AbeAWPOZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2018 10:14:25 -0500 Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]:38319 "EHLO mail-wm0-f53.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751192AbeAWPOX (ORCPT ); Tue, 23 Jan 2018 10:14:23 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x225snPvnY9VV5+gas7GRoDZhAT48hw/1BnAfjpM82puisThSsD8wn4x6ZFJFu/fJ0liUKcD0Bw== Date: Tue, 23 Jan 2018 15:14:19 +0000 From: Lee Jones To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Lars =?iso-8859-1?Q?P=F6schel?= , Samuel Ortiz Subject: Re: mfd/viperboard: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in vprbrd_probe() Message-ID: <20180123151419.prwq62c7gpsnpbx3@dell> References: <9c50fe6a-21cc-e49d-1b10-5d2457ed4e2a@users.sourceforge.net> <20180123125851.ysypf7375sjlgsc6@dell> <20180123130130.powyttapsx3djawx@dell> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 23 Jan 2018, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >> Can you please fix-up all of the patches I've NACKed and collect them > >> up with all the other MFD patches you currently have on the list and > >> send them as a single set please? > >> > >> Reviewing them one after another, is taking a lot of time and causing > >> my a great deal of pain. > > There will be review efforts needed as usual. They might be more noticeable > in this case just because I sent some update suggestions also for software > modules from the directory “drivers/mfd”. "It's not you, it's me!" My preferred mailer (Mutt) re-orders replied-to mails by putting them to the top of my Inbox. At which point I have to re-navigate down to the next patch to review. This is fine for most submissions, but you have fired ~30, mostly individual patches at me. Most of which could realistically be squashed into ~5 patches (if I was feeling mean). The choice is yours though, either squash them into patches dealing with the same type of fix-up or merely send all of the un-applied patches again as a single set, so I can deal with them in a sane manner. > >> I am marking all of your other MFD submissions as 'read and reviewed' > >> and will not be processing any more until the are all contained in a > >> single, threaded set. > >> > >> Thank you! > > > > Also, could you change the subject lines, so they match that expected > > by the subsystem. > > Do you request a resent for almost all changes from this patch series here? I'm not sure I can decipher this. I'd like you to do the following please: - Pull all un-applied MFD patches into a single branch based on Mainline - Add any Reviewed-by/Acked-by's you've received - Fix the subject lines on all of the patches 's///: /' - Resubmit as one single threaded patch-set -- Lee Jones Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog