From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753286AbeA3QCr (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:02:47 -0500 Received: from mail-yw0-f196.google.com ([209.85.161.196]:40102 "EHLO mail-yw0-f196.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751452AbeA3QCq (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:02:46 -0500 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x224Agw8i2zNh6EVRnkAiXvh8ZXwy20pBHJlK67nx+7zDUHxtBM+FNB9t5wr87CxU8PlNPt2w0Q== Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 11:02:44 -0500 From: Sean Paul To: Ville =?iso-8859-1?Q?Syrj=E4l=E4?= Cc: Sean Paul , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , David Airlie , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Daniel Vetter , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drm/edid: use true and false for boolean values Message-ID: <20180130160244.p24of44jgib3botq@art_vandelay> References: <20180130100528.GA7154@training> <20180130150927.3fm5kotyp6vqugaf@art_vandelay> <20180130151946.GC5453@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20180130151946.GC5453@intel.com> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 05:19:46PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 10:09:27AM -0500, Sean Paul wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 04:05:28AM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > > Assign true or false to boolean variables instead of an integer value. > > > > > > This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle. > > > > I suppose you could also fix up the other preferred assignment by adding !! > > to the bitwise & operation. > > Assigning >1 to a bool is well defined. No need to clutter the code with > !! imo. There are examples of both in the file already. I don't have strong feelings either way. Sea > > > > > It's also helpful to post the spatch in the commit message so others can > > replicate your result (this case is pretty trivial, so less important). > > > > Sean > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva > > > --- > > > Changes in v2: > > > - Use true for boolean value in add_detailed_mode as suggested by Daniel > > > Vetter. > > > - Update subject. > > > > > > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c | 4 ++-- > > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > > > index ddd5379..b1cb262 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c > > > @@ -2767,7 +2767,7 @@ do_detailed_mode(struct detailed_timing *timing, void *c) > > > > > > drm_mode_probed_add(closure->connector, newmode); > > > closure->modes++; > > > - closure->preferred = 0; > > > + closure->preferred = false; > > > } > > > } > > > > > > @@ -2784,7 +2784,7 @@ add_detailed_modes(struct drm_connector *connector, struct edid *edid, > > > struct detailed_mode_closure closure = { > > > .connector = connector, > > > .edid = edid, > > > - .preferred = 1, > > > + .preferred = true, > > > .quirks = quirks, > > > }; > > > > > > -- > > > 2.7.4 > > > > > > > -- > > Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS > > _______________________________________________ > > dri-devel mailing list > > dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel > > -- > Ville Syrjälä > Intel OTC -- Sean Paul, Software Engineer, Google / Chromium OS