mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
Cc: Neil Leeder <nleeder@codeaurora.org>,
	Mark Langsdorf <mlangsdo@redhat.com>,
	Jon Masters <jcm@redhat.com>, Timur Tabi <timur@codeaurora.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Mark Salter <msalter@redhat.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] acpi: arm64: add iort support for PMCG
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 12:34:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20180131123434.GA933@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5FC3163CFD30C246ABAA99954A238FA838641882@FRAEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com>

On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:10:47PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:

[...]

> > I went back and re-read the patches, I think the point here is that the
> > perf driver (ie PATCH 2 that, by the way, is not maiinline) uses
> > devm_ioremap_resource() to map the counters and that's what is causing
> > failures when PMCG is part of SMMUv3 registers.
> 
> Thanks for going through this.  No, this is not where we are seeing the failure.
> May be I was not clear in my earlier mail. The failure happens in SMMUv3
> driver probe function when it calls devm_ioremap_resource().

Understood - because the PMU PMCG driver calls it first, that's what
I was referring to.

My point is that:

- the PMCG platform device resources should be built with the correct
  resource hierarchy
- and even then, I do not think that using devm_ioremap_resource() in
  the PMCG PMU driver is the correct way of handling its resource
  reservation (ie the kernel must be able to detect that a resource is
  contained in a parent one but I am not sure devm_ioremap_resource()
  is the way to handle this correctly)

> > It is the resources hierarchy that is wrong and in turn, I do not think
> > devm_request_mem_region() is the right way of requesting it for the
> > PMCG driver.
> > 
> > I need to look into this but I suspect that's something that should
> > be handled in the PMCG driver, that has to request the memory region
> > _differently_ (ie ioremap copes with this overlap - it is the
> > devm_request_mem_region() in devm_ioremap_resource() that fails, correct
> > ?).
> 
> It looks like, in IORT code,
> 
> iort_add_platform_device()--> platform_device_add()-->insert_resource(), inserts
> both SMMUv3 and PMCG resources into the resource tree and then when the probe
> of SMMUv3 is called, it detects the conflict.
> 
> [   85.548749] arm-smmu-v3 arm-smmu-v3.0.auto: can't request region for resource [mem 0x148000000-0x14801ffff]                      
> 
> Of course, changing devm_ioremap_resource() to devm_ioremap() in SMMv3
> driver probe solves the issue for us, but not sure that's the right approach or not.

See above.

Lorenzo

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-31 12:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-08-04 19:59 [PATCH 0/2] arm64 SMMUv3 PMU driver with IORT support Neil Leeder
2017-08-04 19:59 ` [PATCH 1/2] acpi: arm64: add iort support for PMCG Neil Leeder
2017-08-07 11:17   ` Robin Murphy
2017-08-07 20:52     ` Leeder, Neil
2017-08-07 16:44   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-08-07 21:00     ` Leeder, Neil
2018-01-30 10:39   ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2018-01-30 18:00     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-01-31 12:10       ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2018-01-31 12:34         ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]
2017-08-04 19:59 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf: add arm64 smmuv3 pmu driver Neil Leeder
2017-08-07 14:31   ` Robin Murphy
2017-08-07 21:18     ` Leeder, Neil
2017-12-05  5:01     ` Linu Cherian
2018-03-29  7:03   ` Yisheng Xie
     [not found]     ` <e55ab4404143ea0b3cc4795a93e37480@codeaurora.org>
2018-04-01  5:44       ` Neil Leeder
2018-04-02  6:37         ` Yisheng Xie
2018-04-02 14:24           ` Hanjun Guo
2018-04-02 17:59             ` Neil Leeder
2018-04-03  1:15               ` Hanjun Guo
2018-04-04 11:35                 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2018-05-02 14:20           ` Agustin Vega-Frias
2018-05-03  9:22             ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2018-04-18 11:05     ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2018-04-19  1:17       ` Yisheng Xie
2017-08-09  7:56 ` [PATCH 0/2] arm64 SMMUv3 PMU driver with IORT support Hanjun Guo
2017-08-09 15:48   ` Leeder, Neil
2017-08-10  1:26     ` Hanjun Guo
2017-08-11  3:28       ` Leeder, Neil
2017-10-12 10:58         ` Hanjun Guo
2017-10-12 11:05           ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2017-10-12 11:11             ` Hanjun Guo
2017-10-31 23:33 ` Yury Norov
2017-11-02 20:38   ` Leeder, Neil
2017-12-10  2:35 ` Linu Cherian
2017-12-18 14:48   ` Robin Murphy
2017-12-18 15:39     ` Marc Zyngier
2017-12-19  6:55       ` Linu Cherian
2017-12-19 12:11         ` Marc Zyngier
2017-12-19  6:36     ` Linu Cherian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20180131123434.GA933@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=jcm@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=mlangsdo@redhat.com \
    --cc=msalter@redhat.com \
    --cc=nleeder@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=timur@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®