From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752111AbeBANdu (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2018 08:33:50 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([65.50.211.133]:51919 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751405AbeBANdt (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2018 08:33:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2018 14:33:44 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: subhra mazumdar Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, steven.sistare@oracle.com, dhaval.giani@oracle.com Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH V3] sched: Improve scalability of select_idle_sibling using SMT balance Message-ID: <20180201133343.GJ2295@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20180129233102.19018-1-subhra.mazumdar@oracle.com> <20180201123335.GV2249@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20180201123335.GV2249@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 01:33:35PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > I think you want to go allocate sched_domain_shared for the MC level and > use that, much like sd_llc_shared. Also, you'd want to try and get performance numbers for something like Power8, which has SMT8 and fairly expensive atomic ops.